Also exactly the kinda person who might need a gun to defend themselves.

Far Harbor is a good example

Anyone know if this is Chechen and/or Israel related? (Or maybe Assad related?)

Yeah what your saying is he is not famous for his speaking skills, which are normal person levels. So I don’t see why this is surprising

Long limbs are definitely an advantage

Police dogs get you when you’re running, facing head on is different.

I’m seriously questioning the people who said they couldn’t beat a goose in a fight. Geese are terrifying, but they’re still pretty frail. It would hurt, but if it’s to the death it’s pretty clear basically any able adult human would live.

Wdym? The SCOTUS ruling was explicit, the constitution never mentioned it though.

I don’t think it was illegal, or at least the court didn’t.

He couldn’t legally own a pistol. He was determined to have legally possessed a rifle.

Oh I see, idk, seems like he’s just someone who gets scared under pressure

What?

That’s easy to say in retrospect but a lot of people can’t think of something to say when asked something unexpected on the spot. Even if they know the answer.

I don’t agree, that seems like it would be giving official journalists for example special privileges over citizen journalists. Give free reign to racists to lynch counter protestors, etc.

In what state are there laws that would lead to his conviction for double homicide?

That’s easy to say in retrospect, it’s hard for a lot of people to answer something they didn’t expect on the spot, even if they know the answer

No they aren’t laws, but you should follow them if you want to stay in the community. You’re free to disagree with me all you like, but just insulting any user is forbidden

That’s not what I said, but iirc he didn’t cross the gun with state lines- I may be misremembering though.

Fuck off.

Please read the rules if you care so much about laws.

Well why mention that for the analogy then?

Yeah not saying he’s any better lol