• federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    And of course, there was no hierarchy in actual anarchist societies. /s.

    we all know about the bootmaker, but i would say if there is an oppressive hierarchy, it’s not anarchist.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think the anarchists in Spain have more of a claim to define anarchism than you tbh. And they absolutely had authority. Hell, they had concentration camps.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          And you don’t get to no true Scotsman away the Catalonian or Ukrainian anarchists, who did large scale anarchist projects.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Okay, so at this point it seems anarchist societies are pretty impossible, if all these principled anarchists end up forming non-anarchist societies over and over again when they win power.

              So what is even the point of being an anarchist? To feel good about yourself?

                • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Thats literally the difference between us, I believe less exploitation is better than waiting for a perfect solution. Socializing the means of production, even if it doesn’t eliminate all exploitation, eliminates capitalist exploitation, which is a massive win for the working class as it is the main source of our exploitation.

                  I’m not sure if after capitalism is destroyed socialist States will actually wither away or not, but Im sure they’ll be less bloody to move past than capitalism was if it is the latter.

      • federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        We should define an ideology by its actions, not just its claims.

        no. we should judge people by their actions. we should judge ideologies by their propositions.

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          should judge ideologies by their propositions.

          Okay, I see. If we are judging ideologies purely by “wouldn’t it be nice if” then anarchism is clearly superior.

          Well, on second though, no. “wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t get defeated by fascists” certainly has a pretty nice ring to it…

          • federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Okay, I see. If we are judging ideologies purely by “wouldn’t it be nice if” then anarchism is clearly superior.

            you almost got me

            Well, on second though, no. “wouldn’t it be nice if we didn’t get defeated by fascists” certainly has a pretty nice ring to it…

            i’m not saying i have a good plan. i’m saying i am suspicious of any plan that concentrates power, and i believe my suspicion is warranted.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              i’m not saying i have a good plan. i’m saying i am suspicious of any plan that concentrates power, and i believe my suspicion is warranted.

              I mean, look up the life expectancy of China vs India over time. Place your suspicion against the facts.