• PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yup, I was just addressing the point of tangential arrest, sometimes it is well justified.

    • solrize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well you were talking about charging the gun owner if someone else commits a crime with their gun. That’s unrelated to this case where the shooter was the gun owner.

      The lawsuit here is about radicalization but if we’re pursuing companies who do that, I’d start with Fox News.