• davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Maybe it was a bullshit resolution. Time will tell as analysts review its text.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I forget, which country gives Israel the tools it needs to kill hundreds of thousands of children and maintain an apartheid state?

        • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Israel wouldn’t be able to exist without the sponsorship of the US, that’s where it gets most of its shit from. Also wow, almost all those countries are subordinates to the US. How coincidental.

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yes, Israel shouldn’t be allowed to exist. Israel is an affront to and attack on all Jews, perpetrated by Christian zionists, including Nazi Germany.

              There should be a secular democracy without a tiered citizenship system that respects the rights of local jews, Muslims, and Christians, as much as it respects the rights of European immigrants.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              If Israel wants to be a functioning player on the international level they need to play by international rules.

              What they are doing to Gaza is no better than what Russia is doing to Ukraine.

        • bloodfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Here is the text of the tweet and the text of the tweet quoted in it:

          A draft that does not demand an immediate ceasefire, but instead suggests one might be negotiated if certain conditions are met, and that genocidal attacks can otherwise continue, is not a ceasefire resolution. It is a ransom note.

          It quotes the following by Al Jazeera English:

          The US has drafted a new UN Security Council resolution that appears to support a ceasefire in Gaza, after blocking several other attempts at achieving a truce. Al Jazeera’s @baysontheroad looks at what the new US document says.

          The quoted aje tweet is in reference to this video and the video is embedded in the tweet.

          E: what do you do when you don’t have someone around to copy and paste shit from twitter? It seems absurd to block twitter but not have any way of accessing information that’s distributed on that website…