• Cowbee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    A reformist Anarchist? I have legitimately never heard of that kind of combination, lmao. You cannot achieve an ancom society via reform, that’s utter utopianism. Anarcho-communism can only be achieved via revolution, and not even the whole pitchforks and torches kind.

    Check Anarcho-Syndicalism if you want an actual, practical plan for achieving an Anarchist society, or read modern AnCom theory.

    • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      If these ideas are the only workable ideas, why have they failed for the last century?

      We need new ideas that are built on the understanding of our current world. Even places where “leftists” got to power they just turned into capitalist dictatorships or cruel experiments in how far propaganda can be pushed and how much populations can endure suffering and helplessness.

      You’re believing in silliness if you think violent revolution in 2024 will end up in anything but massive death and fascism. We don’t have the numbers to win, all we’d end up doing is scaring voters into putting people into power that will put you in prison and become dictators.

      • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        They haven’t failed, I even suggested reading modern theory. Reform has never worked, and never gotten off the ground.

        I didn’t suggest violent revolution, that’s why I’m suggesting you read modern Anarchist theory, like Anarcho-Syndicalist theory.

        It’s like you read only keywords and answered off of vibes.