Not sure if this was already posted.

The article describes the referenced court case, and the artist’s views and intentions.

Personally, I both loved and hated the idea at first. The more I think about it, the more I find it valuable in some way.

  • RedFox@infosec.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I do agree both things are wrong. Meaning discrimination.

    I think one person’s art in this case might be described as another person’s stunt.

    Edit, as for whether it’s beneficial, not sure. I guess we’ll see.