cyu@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoDivide and rulekbin.runimagemessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1144arrow-down111
arrow-up1133arrow-down1imageDivide and rulekbin.runcyu@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-squareSemi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·6 months agoNation-states were a bad idea
minus-square00x0xx@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoThey make sense, as they were good enough to stop imperial empires from ravaging the world. But their limits are a governing forces are seen today. I do think the age of nation-states are ending soon, and the rise of a new type of state may happen soon. Maybe something like a culture-state?
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-26 months agoAlternatives? I see 2: full hegemonic domination of one nation state where everyone gets their basics met. Star trek style. intense local tribalism where you’re doing a whole lot more defending your land than you are now
minus-squarePotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·6 months agoanarchism, i.e. bottom-up democracy and federal structures. Read up on Rojava for example.
Nation-states were a bad idea
They make sense, as they were good enough to stop imperial empires from ravaging the world. But their limits are a governing forces are seen today.
I do think the age of nation-states are ending soon, and the rise of a new type of state may happen soon. Maybe something like a culture-state?
Alternatives?
I see 2:
full hegemonic domination of one nation state where everyone gets their basics met. Star trek style.
intense local tribalism where you’re doing a whole lot more defending your land than you are now
anarchism, i.e. bottom-up democracy and federal structures. Read up on Rojava for example.