• Trump “will not give a penny” more to Ukraine if he becomes president, Hungary’s prime minister said.
  • That’s how Trump plans to end the war, Viktor Orbán, who met Trump at Mar-a-Lago, said.
  • The Trump campaign has not said whether the pair discussed Ukraine during the visit.
  • IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Anyone who thinks the war will be over when Ukraine falls is a gullible idiot. The Ruskis will march straight to Moldova after the takeover of Ukraine.

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Every non-NATO state on the border will be targeted and incorporated either directly or by being turned into a loyal authoritarian state a la Belarus.

      And if the US leaves NATO, that undermines confidence in NATO. The alliance will fall. At that point, either the EU will have to step in and supplant it – in which case the US will no longer be even be PART of the mightiest diplomatic alliance in the world, much less influential in it – or else there’s no reason to think Russian aggression will stop endlessly escalating until all-out war between nuclear powers is on the table.

      • Quereller@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Additionally, there is already a lot of discussion about nuclear proliferation. Some nations did not develop their own nuclear weapons because the US guaranteed for their security in exchange.

  • oDDmON@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yet another reason that odious orange toad should be denied a second term.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lmao of course Putin’s allies know trumps plans.

    They are Putin’s plans.

    If we genuinely allow this man to run for president and evade jail time, we should genuinely start building guillotines.

    • InfiniteGlitch@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t live in US but I’m immensely surprised he can still run for President with all the things going on with him.

      Thought by now he would’ve been sent to jail/prison.

      • Zron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Unfortunately the US has basically been running on the polite fiction that people who want to be leaders will be good leaders and behave like rational human beings.

        So when someone who has no good intentions and is not rational got into power, we learned that a lot of things we thought of as laws were really just habits.

        And as much as it sucks, it’s actually sensible that trump can run until he’s been proven guilty. Otherwise a wannabe dictator could just drown the opposition in frivolous lawsuits and bar them from running because of the suspicion of crime.

        Don’t get me wrong, I think trump is guilty as sin and is a danger to our democracy. But, we need to be careful how we respond to this, or it could be worse when the next maniac gets into power and starts banning people from running because all of his opponents are suddenly under investigation for tax irregularities or littering.

        • rammer@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          He was found guilty of insurrection in a state court. So that he can’t run for president. But then the federal supreme court decided that this particular provision of the constitution is not self executing. And the Congress must pass a law to find Trump ineligible to run. They didn’t comment on the insurrection part.

          So Trump has been found guilty of insurrection and he can still run for president.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    To be more clear, if Trump manages to capture the presidency, I fully expect him to withdraw the US from NATO.

    And the US leaving NATO would be absolutely, categorically, inarguably, and apocalyptically stupid.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        No, which is why it didn’t happen in his first term. Lots of people threw sand in the gears to slow that effort down.

        It’s just that if he gets in again, he’s openly said he’s going to fire a shitload of people all over the government and replace them with Trump loyalists (regardless of whether or not it’s legal), so it will probably actually happen if he captures the presidency again.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am not sure why people say that when Trump said, if they didn’t honor their commitments, we would leave.

      Since the invasion, most countries have finally stepped up to pair their obligation. Funny how Trump was right.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        No he wasn’t. His comments are a self fulfilling prophecy. If an alliance that is strong because they are united under the US umbrella has the potential leader of said alliance state he no longer feels he needs to back his allies… they must.

        But:

        • The 2% is a guideline not a rule
        • They got to pay… who? The defence industry… it’s not a membership fee.
        • many countries where already investing more
        • spending more on defense is not simple, procurement takes yeeeaaars… so countries that started ramp up projects years ago are now in the position to actually spend more.
        • The only time NATO needed to openly wage war was in defence of the US. So the commitment of the rest of NATO is fact, the US’s isn’t.
        • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          So the commitment of the rest of NATO is fact, the US’s isn’t. Well, if that is the way you feel, then the United States should just leave NATO. If having the largest Army in the world and saving Europe in two wars isn’t proof of commitment, then we should just sit the next one out. It sounds like we are not wanted or needed.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Be more clear in your point. I get you don’t like Trump but what he said was true.

              Now everyone is scurrying because he was right.

              Hate the man as much as you want but at the end of the day, he was right.

              You fight a war with the Army you have, not the one you can build in the next five years. Europe has not taken their defense seriously, and it isn’t our job to spend our money to defend Europe. It is our job to help in their defense.

              Putin was a wakeup call to Europe and hopefully they leaned you always need to be prepared for war.

          • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Ah the “Fine, I’ll takey ball and go home” arguement.

            Referring to WW2 that was self preservation as much as anything else, and it is not like they got poorer from it. The US made bank after WW2.

            The US called upon NATO after September 9th and everyone came. So that also shows something, but I guess that does not count.

            And now the US is gearing up for their “inevitable” conflict with China. But for that they will need their allies too. So by showing your allies you are unreliable, countries might start making other choices. You know, self preservation.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              Ww2 was because Japan attacked the United States and in brilliant move, Germany declared war.

              If we go to war with China, we don’t need the help of others. They need our help.

              It’s why Australia is asking for us to build bases. They know they can’t take China.

              Japan at least is taking it seriously and arming up for war. They beat China once

                • Neuromancer@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  We are exceptional. We are the only real super power in the world. I am not ashamed of my country. We need to the beacon of the world and sadly we’ve let that falter. We need another Reagan to get us back on track

  • theodewere@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    his plan for COVID was just ignoring that problem as well… i think he likes to hide from problems and so do all of his piggy supporters…

    everyone knows it’s time to invade Russia and give that regime the merciful death it’s asking for

    • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      As much as I’d like that regime to disappear, I wouldn’t go so far as to invade Russia. Putin’s nuclear sabre rattling is obviously bullshit when it comes to Ukraine, but backing them that far into the corner with an invasion is probably one of the few things that brings a real nuclear risk. I’d be more for the “measured” response of hunting down and eliminating any Russian assets found outside Russian borders, perpetually until the Russian people chose a leader who is capable of living in civilized society.

        • Username02@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          The Russians also committed a lot of heinous crimes. If you want to bet, place your bet on how many people will die in a nuclear fire, not will it happen or will it not.

  • Zuberi 👀@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Lemmy.world is going to be really fucking surprised when the leftists don’t vote for either fascist candidate and you’re stuck with the orange fuhrer