Nah, he’s just consulting.

I was expecting this:
https://youtu.be/OD3Tq13ZuLg?si=dLh9hg-DLHte5Meo

“Of course she’s supposed to be missing fingers. It symbolises her past suffering.”

That is the charitable explanation.

100% agreed.

Speaking of No Man’s Sky, I got it for VR and never played it flatscreen, but I have over 100 hours in it even though the VR mode is ridiculously terrible and mods go only so far to fix some of the annoyances.

Awww, such a cutie!

I once had the opportunity to pet an owl and it’s kinda weird how the feather-shape offers almost no resistance and underneath is just a typical bird shape. I’ll stick to petting cats in the future.

It’s still dumb as hell tho.

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-

I_l

Cats.

Yet you keep engaging. Curious.

Yet calling the simple rules that govern video game enemies AI is not controversial. Since when does AI have not to be fake to be called that?

I mean, I wouldn’t expect people on a fishing forum to spend all their time talking about how much hiking sucks.

Well, kinda, but the trajectory of the photon is contracted into a single point from its POV. Whatever destination is has, it’s already there as far as it’s concerned. It doesn’t experience time given that it’s moving at the speed of light.

Lobo is.

Most of them were said by Dan Quayle.

Anymore?

There’s only one substance more powerful than adamantium in Marvel comics: popularity-induced plot armour.