Alpha Protocol - rereleased on GOG now! Get it while it’s hot with only a slight discount!
Still as buggy as ever! And it will probably work on your modern PC!
Support the revival of old games!
This is not an ad! It’s a series of exclamations!
Alpha Protocol - rereleased on GOG now! Get it while it’s hot with only a slight discount!
Still as buggy as ever! And it will probably work on your modern PC!
Support the revival of old games!
This is not an ad! It’s a series of exclamations!
Can they see passwords? If so, I recommend not using the same stuff for every instance.
Long enough to teach some monkeys how to make fire.
Or just set them on fire…
I’d say empathy is a social skill learned through experience or proper education.
It can still be distorted and applied selectively or even outright ignored.
And at its core, it can be both simple and complex. Whatever emotions you feel and why can be felt by anyone else in the same way, but perhaps for different things.
So the main thing empathy asks is to understand that, to accept that having their experience and knowledge from their life is what guides their decisions, just as your own guide yours.
We don’t know the same things and we should appreciate that difference, even though we might not agree with it.
Empathy for animals is easier to have because they are simpler to gauge and direct in their actions. Less of a headache to deal with the why’s.
Mass immigration into Cuba?
What’s interesting is that the language allows multiple meanings. The commenter above can either be driven bonkers by presence of nuance or the lack of it and both interpretations are correct.
The first sentence can be seen as being against nuance or it can be seen as being against the online experience of asking for nuance.
The next sentences can be seen as arguments against nuance or examples of behaviour encountered when asking for it.
And the final bonkers can either be against the use of nuance or the repeated responses to it use.
So without further clarification, we can’t really be sure which stance the commenter implies.
With only these two situations presented, it’s a 50/50, left or right choice, so I’ll go ahead and presume it’s the latter, since that seems to be more likely encountered in online chats.
The tale of Samson. It’s always the tale of Samson.
Why, why why? Delilah!
How much of a responsibility? Is a token effort enough or should you be charged with a crime for not trying hard enough?
Live life like there’s no tomorrow then.
The key is having someone or something you’re satisfied with and keep at it for the joy they provide.
WebMD says it’s a brain tumor. Or an ear infection. Or lupus. But it’s almost never lupus.
No. You assume it’s bullshit and think that’s the truth.
Which is great because this isn’t a topic I’m willing to defend. Proof in this case at the wrong moment would afterwards require an escalation of violence few people would be comfortable with.
Empathy is generally described as the ability to take on another’s perspective, to understand, feel and possibly share and respond to their experience.
We’re all the same, equally susceptible to bad influences that can compound and overwhelm our sense of right and wrong.
No one is beyond saving, but sometimes the effort needed to do so is impossible to reach.
So if some random hacker takes over your network connection and publishes illegal content which then leads back to you, you should be held responsible. It’s your platform after all.
The inflation graphic used is misleading, likely to shock and disturb. I saw that 20% as 80-90% as well the first time.
You’re really expecting a source for this type of thing as if a leak wouldn’t have the unavoidable side effect of escalating things beyond anyone’s control.
The evidence are the decisions made by every major power across the last century. The various leaks already made public show that the those able to do it are also willing to do it.
You see all the bad things done so far and yet think to yourself, of course they wouldn’t do this? Really.
Have you considered emulating the original ones?