Or if they’re like Israel, they do but the leadership rejects the warnings

Symbolic AI? Pretty sure a combo of that and ML would be needed. Pure ML is too unreliable and have limited coherence, and nobody knows how to program useful symbolic AI from scratch. But if you combine them they can cover each other’s weak spots.

I remember when Google started running classifiers backwards for the first time to produce the very first generation of generative ML. Very small crowd following it closely.

How many judges pose for photos with the defendant of violent crimes? That judge did.

Toilet Paper USA

Fun fact, legal citizens have been deported by ICE before because they didn’t care to check the paperwork correctly

Exactly this. Billionaires does this because the interest rate is cheaper than paying taxes.

Corporate espionage stuff. Some pile of documents a gov agency reviewed for compliance reasons, and which a competitor wants.

He didn’t choose most of these documents because of their contents, just because they’re classified to satisfy his power trip, so all the jury needs to know is that they’re genuine government documents which are classified which he didn’t have the right to take.

If this case had involved what he did with information in it then sure, but it ISN’T

Does the official mod tools include full license assignment or waiver of right to attribution?

I’m seeing multiple numbers

$10 here https://www.salary.com/research/salary/alternate/waiter-hourly-wages

$14 here, but also some are paid just $2/h and are expected to make the rest they need from tips: https://en.as.com/latest_news/how-much-does-a-waiter-in-the-us-earn-per-hour-what-is-the-average-salary-n/

No, it’s because the finding was made in civil court, not criminal court, therefore not convicted.

The people who made this doesn’t have an IQ score, they have an iQ score

If you’re out of shape then you can use your abs for non-Euclidean geometries

When a trial involving a jury has resulted in a judgement of innocence it can’t be appealed under pretty much any circumstances at all. The only way to appeal from the prosecution when they didn’t win is if it’s a hung trial / mistrial or equivalent error and there wasn’t a ruling of innocence.

(under US law, plenty of other countries have some ability to appeal if they believe there was some serious error or new evidence has been found)

Extreme take on mutually assured destruction when neither side wants to give up. Removing all firearms entirely and then instead trying to harass each other’s army away, lmao

Unironically yes, sometimes. A lot of the best works which its training samples are based on cites the original poster’s qualifications, and this filters into the model where asking for the right qualifications directly can influence it to rely more on high quality input samples when generating its response.

But it’s still not perfect, obviously. It doesn’t make it stop hallucinating.

The map is not the territory

• uses the same type of armor for females as certain other games, except with realistic defense stats instead

Any LLM won’t have the right architecture to implement that kind of math. They are built specifically to find patterns, even obscure ones, that nobody knows of. They could start flagging random shit indirectly associated with gender like relative timing between jobs or rate of promotions, etc, and you wouldn’t even notice it’s doing it