Nope. I don’t talk about myself like that.

  • 0 Posts
  • 25 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle




  • We are all vulnerable to manipulation and should only read content that is approved by the US Govt.

    Blocking another country’s possible influence is not the same as ONLY being fed whatever the Government approves.

    TIktok, due to the nature of the company’s ownership and board directors WILL have Chinese Government influence. And they’ve already proven that they’re willing to influence the internet to the point of controlling it 99% for their own citizens. China is the latter of the above statement. The USA and most other countries are barely even doing the former.


  • calling America West England

    But there is part of America that basically is West England. That’s called Canada.

    But yeah china would never allow free expression on their version of tiktok but let’s ban free expression because china does is a bad argument.

    What you post on Tiktok is free speech. How it get manipulated and shared to everyone else by an algorithm controlled by a Country that has everything to gain from the downfall of the USA is not free speech.




  • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.comtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldShe did her best ok?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    these online professors

    But unfortunately I go to a brick and mortar college

    These two statement directly conflict with each other. No wonder you think they’re bad professors… You’re missing your classes.

    But did you really think I was complaining about some kindergarten pizza party bullshit?

    Yes. because you’re clearly a child. I still suspect that you’re so supremely butt hurt about not having your little square lunchroom pizza that it’s the primary reason why you act like a seven year old (at best).








  • No, that violates the fair use act

    Negative.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

    Thus, fair use need not even be raised as a defense unless the plaintiff first shows (or the defendant concedes) a prima facie case of copyright infringement.

    and

    However, binding agreements such as contracts or licence[sic] agreements may take precedence over fair use rights.

    You can enter into a contract. There is no requirement that the original work is unpaid. Quite the opposite. If the original IP owner purchases it, since they own the IP there’s no case of copyright infringement. And nothing stops the work creator from entering into contracts.

    Edit: I’m not arguing this. This is literally the ONLY way to get paid for fair use materials. Period. You’re wrong. Fair use is an anti-copyright lawsuit claim. There is no issue of copyright if you sell to the original copyright owners.

    And even then… EVEN IF you were correct. Your claim that they cannot sell it to the original IP holders doesn’t just allow them to steal the work. That’s still theft.



  • It’s so cool and amazing that we finally have home theatre systems in every fucking house

    Yeah I’ve noticed this too and it bothers me. We had 4 way split on 20inch tube tvs on hardware that measure their ram in MBs… But on modern 75+inch tvs on consoles with GBs of ram… Nah, too hard. You need to buy 4 copies of the game and have 4 separate setups… and probably need to be in 4 separate houses.

    Couch co-op dying is basically when I stopped bothering with consoles all together. If I’m going to use a glorified PC, might as well just use a full fat PC and ignore consoles all together. I miss the N64 days.