AggressivelyPassive

But it’s not good publicity, just like the soup throwing is not food publicity.

Everyone already knows about both problems and everyone who wants to have an opinion already has one. But those who are on the fence about it, will be alienated by this.

Such an action might have been a reasonable publicity stunt in the 20s, but definitely not today.

The equivalent would be to enslave white children to show them what slavery is.

Seriously, why do you think it’s okay to discriminate against people as retaliation? How do you think that helps anyone? Do you really think, a misogynist will stand in front of this art gallery and reflect whether women might actually be real humans after all? What’s happening is, that a bunch of selfrighteous pseudo-intellectuals will jerk each other off on how progressive and artsy they are, and a bunch of actual misogynists have even more fuel for their crowd to stoke their hate. Wow. What a win for everyone involved. Alienation of former allies and even more hate. A true victory.

And the fact that there’s almost never a clear answer anyway. There are very few instances where blanket statements are true.

Also, how often do you have the scientific or journalistic background to prove your point?

Maybe his idea of a town square is more like a place for Nuremberg rally events.

If you’d be ISIS, you’d probably blow yourself up in your workshop, since judging from your comments, you don’t understand reality as much as you think you do. Which ironically is kind of a requirement for joining a religious terrorist group.

I’m trying to show you the limits of your argument. And you don’t even see it.

It’s art to me. Are you the authority on art now?

A good litmus test says you think sexism doesn’t exist and are, therefore, a dumbasshole.

So, if I say that sexism is not good, even in art, then I say sexism doesn’t exist and am therefore an asshole? Well, in that case I propose that whatever group you feel attached to should be denied access to any healthcare, and if you think that’s any form of *ism than I say you’re stupid. That does look very weird, does it?

You fundamentally don’t understand the issue here. You have your gut feeling of “sexism against women bad, art good”, which is not even wrong in principle, but you take that to the extreme by saying “every art roughly aiming in the general direction of sexism is good” - and that’s bad. Even worse is, that you accuse everyone who disagrees of being the most vile sexist ever.

The key difference is that a) the sexism criticized by the artist is already illegal and b) (this might be a revelation for some people) hamburgers are not people, Jews are people.

Even if you did a Jews only club, that would be illegal - and rightly so.

The US warned Russia two weeks ago about this happening. And Putin called it blackmail. ISIS apparently already claimed the attack .

And let’s be honest: Russia will find a way to blame that on Ukraine anyway.

Then explain why exactly is this not sexist? A good litmus test for such things is to replace the group in question with Jews. If it sounds antisemitic, you might have an *ism going on.

So let’s do that “Jew sued art gallery for being denied entry in a non-jew only exhibition”. Sounds pretty antisemitic, right?

Depending on the type of cancer that might still not help. Pancreatic cancer is pretty much a death sentence unless it’s detected very early.

They wrote “cheap m1 MacBook”. That’s 8gb ram in total. You can’t reasonably compare a GPU with 8gb of dedicated RAM to 8gb of shared main memory.

And shit like MS randomly deciding to essentially brick millions of devices for no reason doesn’t exactly help the issue.

There needs to be a guarantee for updates. And especially developers need to get their shit together and not bloating every shitty little app to a monster.

Teams alone, while being idle in the background, consumes more RAM than my 2004 laptop had installed - and I ran GTA, ICQ, MSN and iTunes simultaneously on that thing.

We don’t know that. What are they even measuring? New installs? New accounts? What is a DAU? Opened the app this day? Engaged with the app? Looked at a notification? What is the measured user base? Can this population be called representative for the entire user base?

Without detailed information about that, this kind of data is basically astrology.

The AI was flabbergasted, obviously.

TikTok’s DAU growth rate has collapsed.

That might as well be saturation. If you already have nearly 100% of the target demographic on your app, there’s not much room to grow.

Also, that data is from some mobile analytics firm, how reliable are those numbers?

Sorry for reminding you.

That’s actually a more general problem here. Or maybe indicator.

Trump will spout an opinion on everything, but at the exact point where his opinion actually matters and would have consequences, he dodges and claims ignorance.

What a coward.

Building the entire pipeline initially would be insane, true.

But as an aspiration, it’s not that dumb. Start with a highly optimized ARM chip in gen 1, add more ASIC components in gen 2, have some packaging in-house for gen 3, etc. etc.

OpenAI seems to aim at the long game. Investing billions now to save trillions later could be sane.