This CEO has been a problem from day one, and there needs to be a movement to get rid of them.
This CEO has been a problem from day one, and there needs to be a movement to get rid of them.
I suspect idolisation by reflection. When Patrick Bateman is one upped socially he turns into a liquidy angry mess, thus serves as a reflection of how some autists feel when they’re out of their element socially or emotionally.
…and I think there’s something for autistic people to idolize in the fact that he just goes on, regardless of his disassociative breaks from healthy socialisation.
No, he’s not a healthy model, but I can understand people feeling something is reflected there.
Of course in actual fact it’s satire of the high society side of the 1980s patriarchal finance bros… But post modernism dictates that each individual will have their own interpretations.
Because it’s not a list of rapists, just a list of people Epstein was interested in having influential control over.
…and even going to the Island just meant he was trying to influence you. He was looking for whatever leverage he could find over people.
Can we stop letting the actions of a few bad people be used to curtail our freedom on platforms we all use.
I don’t want the internet to end up being policed by corporate AIs and poorly implemented bots (looking at you auto-mod).
The internet is already a husk of what it used to be, what it could be. It used to be personal, customisable… Dare I say it; messy and human…
… maybe that was serving a need that now people feel alienated from. Now we live as corporate avatars who risk being banned every time we comment anywhere.
It’s tiresome.
So Reddit can but Lemmy can’t? Sad.
They could have at least gone with SCAR, rather than SACR.
I don’t really get the far left image, is it saying people on the far left are sponsored by tyre and racing companies?
UNRWA is doing an investigation, and has already fired around 4 or so people. The numbers involved are far fewer than Israel has claimed.
Water bears?
Would probably work better if the word wasn’t the first in the sentence. Humans probably use the first half of a sentence in their initial assumptions about what it’s likely saying… Probably prioritising the first few the most.
I believe his contribution was the idea that a dictatorship of the prolitariate is untenable, and that the state needs a single leader in order to achieve Marxism.
Oh yeah, the business plot… I mean er, the brooks brothers riots, i mean er… Jan 6th.
Huh, funny how it’s always coming from a specific segment of society.