There are a couple indies and mods working on that! The trick definitely is to lower the power needed, maybe through a series of fine gunned models (might also lower the amount anacrinisms too)
There are a couple indies and mods working on that! The trick definitely is to lower the power needed, maybe through a series of fine gunned models (might also lower the amount anacrinisms too)
Had two moments where me and room mates were out of work during covid and got to post pone my mortgage for the year. Then when it came to pay they offered a refinance deal that took 3% off my loan.
I like to think of myself as a forward planning oppertunist, so a lot of my good fortune is hardworking and foresight. That was shear fucking luck on my part.
My thoughts were sandboxing, so run it in a container with only predefined hooks out. That way you know what parts of the system a theme is wanting to change or access (think flatpak).
I do like the use of subset languages to reduce attack surfaces (eBPF comes to mind as an example definitely not a solution to here those lol).
In terms of writing both Owlcat and Larian are both exceptional IMHO. They both have made games that are just massive in scope IMHO. Obviously Larians technical polish on BG3 is also world class, and I hope that some of those pieces can trickle down to more devs.
I’m still disappointed that stadia didn’t work out in some ways. Imagine if they were working more like valve improving community tools culminating in the basis for their cloud offering.
No I honestly just don’t see where you address that. I keep saying that the community and parents SHOULD have as say in setting the agenda and curriculum of the classroom, but it should be done in equal collaboration with students and staff.
You seem to be saying it should be just be a collaboration of students and staff.
So parents and the rest of society have no say in how its ran?
What if its the inverse though, teachers that don’t want critical race theory but parents wanting it?
I’m not saying it as a hypothetical this just was my experience in school. My parents were way more progressive than the teachers were.
I mean, what is the alternative to letting them have equal voting rights and having the rights to free speach as you and I?
Market security maybe What’s next im not allowed to read the EULA because i may come up with nefarious ways to still use the service?
I guess to me that’s the price of democracy, even those people deserve a voice. Where I draw the line is where assume this gives them unfettered, unmediated rights over other people (their children).
Open Source: The tools we reach for our children become the basis for a lot of their lives, we shouldnt be forcing them into life long expectations of subscriptions and surveillance)
More Democratic: Students, staff, parents, and the community all should have measurable and legally binding power over how the school functions
More immersion less memorization: More emphasis of people learning how to do and be less on passing tests. Ideally people should leave school with practical skill to do something, including academic research, scientific discovery, civic engagement, financial planning, wood working, etc
I really like the idea of more volunteer mentors for specialities and AI for shaping reusable content for children to learn from too. So rather that say a teacher assigning homework from a preselected workbook and reading assignments from a book, instead students are assessed and have reading, video, interactive content shapped for them to get prerequzite knowledge from to help prepare them for activities with mentors.
Watching the trotsky movie radicalized me and getting to see some real examples from schools in the US. The idea that students should have a actual, measureable, legally accepted vote in how their school runs feels immoral not to have.
At least a seat on the board. Make the student body president a meaningful thing to vote on instead a prom king figurative role!
That said I do think parents and the community have a right to representation of their interests as well, so we may disagree on your last point.
I feel like it goes with the law and order cadence too lol
Yeah the fear mongering works. I was getting cease and dissits, BT traffic blocked, etc when I was using to get public domain content back in 2000 something. Now every that does it talks about how to do it safely. Use a VPS in a non-five eyes country with Tor enabled and logging disabled, download to your tails desktop and sneaker net to main machine, from there use media server to host it in your network, blah blah blah
Or use duck duck go and click through a dozen links and stream it.
Heck even peertube users get flak from governments because it could be seen as “redistribution”.
P2P is almost always a better for user technology, but centralization is favored by governments for control and corporations for rent seeking.
I mean IPFS was that solution to me for a while tbh. Even then libp2p like peertube uses and matrix offer some exciting examples into the future.
I don’t think the plan is to sell it but to be able make accept payments of good and services in it.
The dune series has a lot on maxim8sing human thinking and will as an alternative to an AI driven future.
For economic success I recommend finding a niche, find somethings others want done but don’t want to do themselves and hopefully you enjoy.
School may or may not be needed from there. Its useful if credentials are a preq for the industry but there are other ways to learn some things like on the job and volunteer work.
I know things like greencore, peacecore, americore, joining the national guard are fulfilling for a lot of people looking for that “greater than themselves” expirence.
If its not open source I’m not that interested. The gamed industry is full of cool but fucking useless tech because way too much is proprietary