Manager: “So, welcome to our office, you’ll be working her…” Arrows flies between him and his interlocutor

New hire: “WHAT THE…”

Manager:“Oh right, watch out for Stimmy Jimmy, he shoots arrows all over the place, helps him focus.”

A sentence said by a math teacher I had once : “A choice is right as long as it is made.”

I love this dog

^ That’s what it’s all about!

You probably wasted more time making it tho

Would depend how it’s achieved. The most realistic way would be through mass automation, but the question is now “who owns the machines that produce everything?” A minority controlling these means of production would mean the rest of the world is at their mercy. If they manage to maintain their ownership (though a fully automated defense force, I guess), they can have the rest of the world doing whatever they want… But what do they need these people for then? All they are is a threat, as they are prone to revolt. Genocide seems like a handy option if the elites are sufficiently ruthless, but it would be hard to put in place; there are many people in the world and they can be inventive when fighting for their lives. Beside, there would probably be several such elite groups, still divided in different country; one who starts building large armies and stacking weapons might attract hostility from their neighbors. Providing the people with their needs to pacify them? Sure, but what if they want more? Or what if they make their own automated armies with the free time they have not worrying about starvation? Keeping them occupied seems safer. Why not invent some bogus job that doesn’t actually need to be done and have them believe they still need to earn their living? That could solve the problem from the elite’s point of view. So basically, no change for the people.

With collective ownership of the means of production and an egalitarian spread of wealth, it could be cool tho. People would just do whatever they want, many would still probably undertake collective project, either to further better life of for the fun of it. There could still be forms of conflicts about how some things are managed and by whom, tho…

The way I see it, if I walk far enough in a given direction, I’ll either arrive to my destination or to a point were it’s obvious I’m walking the wrong way (ex: I’m leaving the city and I know I’m in the right city, or I’m facing the river and I know I’m on the right bank, etc…); at which point I just have to turn around and start again. Reiterate enough times and you’re bound to arrive eventually.

If I understood right, you are under the impression that the original post is from an incel calling out someone for being enthusiastic about determinist philosophy; and wrongfully likening it to a fetish. A few bits of context seem to have eluded you:

• The poster in the image has the lesbian flag on their profile pic. It may not be impossible for a lesbian to be an incel, but at the very least it takes Tumblr OP a bit further from suspicion.
• The screenshot is from Tumblr. You wouldn’t be blamed for not knowing this, but some Tumblr users have a way of posting that consists of simply describing a new and humorous character concept that they came up with. This could be related to the fanfiction community. It is not a description or a critique of an actual person, just Tumblr OP thinking “wouldn’t it be funny if…”.
• Another thing with this very same Tumblr community is how common it is for them to talk and meme about kinks. Something Lemmy OP has picked on, judging by the title, is that the reason the fictional character is horny is that the absence of free will is similar to bondage or a similar form of erotic domination. This is the original joke.

Better thou not have a weak liver

If thou would contend with this monster

Good bot!