What’s a good way to procrastinate

Oh you misunderstood my post—I meant that the writer could only write what they know, i.e. something from the perspective of a human

The problem is that there is no giant psychic space spider, but in fact a human pretending to write from the pov of a giant psychic space spider. Empathy only carries you so far before your own biases and cognitive distortions start to have an effect again.

There isn’t a right or wrong answer. It may also simply be that Sandlers character should focus on family. But maybe the answer would have been different for a different character

deleted by creator

I don’t get it, bite into something, or eat something sweet?

Ah yes, it’s the basis for the formal theory of androgyny. I also enjoy the corollary: when you’re older, you’ll look like the product of an older version of your parents having had sex.

It’s icewind dale or arcanum

Cat is so cool it needs flames on its coat to balance shit out

It’s okay pups, mommy’s a necromancer

And that’s how Cerberus was born

I think it’s important to remember that everyone has different levels of emotional intelligence, and people like me who are mildly autistic are slow at learning appropriate responses. But more importantly, if someone treats you less than you’d like, it’s not a reflection of you.

Some vaginas have nuts, so you can eat both

For sure! I rewatch that movie annually

All well said! It’s not a particularly thoughtfully made creature feature like The Thing or Cloverfield or The Descent or Ginger Snaps, but like you said there’s lots to appreciate about it.

I also like the idea of underwater labs, it was super interesting to me when I first saw it as a kid, I remember that 😁

You get a paper bag and an address

Okay, I have to it see it then!

Yeah I love em 🥲

Hmm no I’d think. I think creature has to be humanoid or animal, but that’s my pov. Perhaps was human at one time, like in Ginger Snaps. Those are excellent movies, now that I recall them!

Per my understanding it’s all usually part of the same legislative action

You can’t ever “fix” anything, you can only provide an attempt at a solution and then try again after you observe its effects. Unfortunately politicians and policymakers are expected to behave as omniscient beings and forecast all effects (and punished for unintended outcomes), when really the should be encouraged to act like scientists

No, I think passing legalization for anything doesn’t make sense unless you have a framework in place (even if imperfect) for regulating some negative externalities of it. I think that’s pretty routine, and there are already examples we can use from other places so the same mistakes are not made again

Here’s an interesting report: https://journalistsresource.org/economics/legalized-prostitution-human-trafficking-inflows/

And this one: https://journals.law.harvard.edu/crcl/to-protect-women-legalize-prostitution/

Policy makers just have to understand the data and frame a policy using what we already know