deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Not really.
“We don’t have anything definitive and we can only speculate, which we’re not going to do.”
You could copy the manual on a xerox machine. Of course some publishers were smart and printed the manual in such a way it any copies came out as an illegibly dark mess.
So naturally you took a legitimate manual, manually transcribed it, and made copies of the copy.
10 PRINT "FARTS"
20 GOTO 10
RUN
It’s not, unfortunately. Anything with more than 0.3% delta-9 by dry weight is still “marijuana”.
Hilariously, the farm bill did open the doors for legal delta-8 and delta-10 products – which was certainly not their intention. A lot of states quickly closed that “loophole” though.
deleted by creator
There is a reason China has banned most US-based software in the mainland
I’m not at all saying what the USA is doing is right, but I find it hilarious Beijing is upset about it.
“It’s only OK when we do it!!!”
Also Disney once told a family no multiple times regarding putting Spider-Man on their dead child’s tombstone.
This is one of those situations where it’s better to ask forgiveness than permission. Even the most cold-hearted corporate ghoul is going to understand the cost/benefit of going after that family isn’t remotely worth it.
Yeah, the lawyers are going to say “no”. But even if they’re stupid enough to sue: some suit that isn’t a moron is going to tell them to drop it during the ensuing PR nightmare, and the family will be swimming in donations.
Film of the era also made people look older. Old film is sensitive to UV light, which exaggerates/makes visible “flaws” in skin you wouldn’t see or notice otherwise.