Nothing you said makes sense.

Go ahead and sue me.

Why on Earth would I do that?

He is a murderer. Just because the state messed up the case doesn’t make him less than a murderer.

And you declaring him a murderer doesn’t make him one any more than the state’a failure makes him not one - neither of which is relevant, since we’re discussing what he’s famous for, not making value judgments.

If you kill someone and the police never catch you are you a murderer?

In every country on Earth, including whichever one you live in, it is possible to kill someone without it being murder. This is true in every culture and every religion.

Who you are as a person is not altered by what some civil servants say about you.

Now we’re out past the deep end of irrelevancy. At least when you were focused on actions people did or did not take, you were within the same ballpark as the topic. Who people are as persons has absolutely no relevancy. You might as well as brought up different ways to make pasta.

You sound deeply unhinged. You might want to take a deep breath and figure out what you’re even talking about.

Sure, you’re entitled to your opinion. That doesn’t make them famous for murder.

He was literally acquitted of murder. I’m not saying he’s famous - he’s really an obscure nobody - but his biggest claim to fame not only is legally not murder, claiming it is murder in a way people might take seriously, like a newspaper article, would open you up to liability for slander, since you’d be making claims it would be easy to prove in court you knew to be false when you made them.

He’s a killer, yes. He killed people. That’s considered potentially distinct from murder in checks notes every country on Earth.

Yes.

1. He’s not famous for murder.
2. The university didn’t invite him to talk, it was just the venue.

Andrew Tate is the absolute worst, but it is also a fact - one that has been true for all of recorded history - that competing with each other for female attention is a generally popular male motivation. And when a guy doesn’t do those things, he can expect mockery. Do you have anything nice to say about neckbeards? No? Didn’t think so.

Bear in mind Lemmy is an overall very leftist platform. Claiming an outside observer can tell a man from a woman is going to attract downvotes, let alone going on to list alleged specific differences.

Note to readers, because I am used to Lemmy: Anyone assuming I agree or disagree with any given take on gender differences can fuck off. My actual post conveys no opinion on them.

“African American Vernacular English” sounds like an awfully racist term for it.

You have an inalienable right to stfu. Use it.

Or to North Dakota, which might be a good deal more entertaining.

I believe the leftist argument you’re up against is that no one should have guns, including the police.

Implementing this is left as an exercise for the reader.

No, it’s worse. If you go sunbathing on the beach and fall asleep, you’re a criminal.

There is no such line. The pillow counts as a weapon and all weapons count as deadly.

They would stack with Federal laws, but yes. I.e. you could be arrested by the Feds for breaking Federal law or separately the state for breaking state law.

Example consequences include the Feds granting someone asylum who nonetheless gets deported by the state and, well, Texas deporting people from blue states because they’ve decided they don’t like those people.

It’s blatantly, abundantly unconstitutional. That hasn’t exactly stopped SCOTUS in the past, but it’s exactly as unconstitutional as the Feds having jurisdiction over pot possession.

That is a good one.

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

If it comes up, she can, for example, order the documents be provided to the defense as part of discovery. I would not be shocked to learn she has the power to do something similar with the jury - but this sounds like an undeniable excuse for Smith to ask for her to be overridden by her superiors, like he did earlier in the case.

Welcome to Mother Jones. They’re like The Root - I swear they deliberately hire the least qualified, least competent “journalists” available.

Here’s a real article about what happened.

Speaking as someone who was severely bullied, I knew to a certainty that I would get my ass kicked no matter what I did, so fighting back had no real downsides.

Of course, it also didn’t work, any more than it did for Nex. Exactly like with Nex, ambushing did not win the fight for me, because it’s just an urban legend that all bullies are cowards who will flee if you fight back.