A few things that are accessible within the USA include:

  • Participating in mutual aid programs
  • Campaigning on the local level, including for positions like poll watchers
  • Making your voice heard in community events in general
  • Joining your local DSA, networking
    • clayh@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Gotta make sure everyone knows they’re “cool” and totally part of the club

    • anarchost@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I made another post asking how people who wouldn’t vote were planning on doing direct action, and I got criticized for not asking about the people who were… so I made this post.

      I can’t win

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Are you an American? Because the only Americans who call people “leftist” are using it in a pejorative sense.

        • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Are you an American? Because the only Americans who call people “leftist” are using it in a pejorative sense.

          The only people who think leftist is a pejorative are conservatives. Hmmmm…

          Call me a liberal though - and I’ll probably ignore it because it’s not worth explaining the difference to most people who will do so. But in my head dem’s fighting words. And ironically, I think there are many who also identify as leftists who would think I’m not left enough to call myself a leftist.

          Signed, a Leftist.

      • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I can’t win

        Leftism isn’t about winning, that’s the part you’re missing. If you’re just doing what you can to win than you’re no different to and will fall for the same things as a fascist. I remember hearing “leftists are addicted to losing” and what makes that quote especially good is that it came from a guy who later outed themselves as being a fascist infiltrator once they no longer needed to convince people to vote Democrat.

        Marxists don’t care about winning. That’s idealism. What we want is an improving of material conditions for the working class.

        • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          What he meant is that people are unhappy when he asks about non-voters, and also when he asks about voters. He can’t win [the approval of people on Lemmy]. Also, not all leftists are marxists.

          • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If you can be a “leftist” without being at least some branch of marxism, than the term has lost all its meaning. I mean you don’t have to like the guy (he has many flaws) to realize the importance his work had on kickstarting the anticapitalist movement that started the left.

            • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I self identify as a leftist but I don’t think I’m ready to call myself a marxist. Maybe one day that will change, maybe not. Regardless of what definitions you may be about to link for me, what I think usually separates me from those I view as liberals is that they tend not to see corporate greed as a problem, or not as a pervasive problem.

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                The problem with corporation isn’t the “greed,” becuase that aspect is unsolvable. It’s that their current structure exists to exploit everything possible to benefit a very small number of people and they all act in cohort without coordination. A virtuous corporation cannot exist.

                • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  It’s that their current structure exists to exploit everything possible to benefit a very small number of people

                  I’m going to keep calling this greed.