As a big fan of IF, I find this really depressing.

  • Lmaydev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Doesn’t matter if it’s peer reviewed. There isn’t enough data to establish causality.

    Chances are people who do those sorts of diets are already at risk. That’s the super important data points we don’t have.

    So even if their peers confirm the data is accurate and their analysis is accurate it doesn’t mean anything without further study.

    • ArtVandelay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yep, I don’t see any way they could prove statistical significance as they could not reject the null hypothesis.