• fidodo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I read the whole article and it didn’t fucking mention the specifics of the case at all. Which part are they suing over specifically?

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      At least one thing is supposedly rejecting payments apps and things that competed with built-in Apple apps and services.

      • fidodo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The article said that was already disallowed by a prior court ruling. I want to know what’s in the new case.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      This means that the reporters haven’t read through all the hundreds of pages yet.