FatCat@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoThe DMA already having an impact. Brave Browser installs surge after introduction of browser choice splash screen on iOS.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square194fedilinkarrow-up194arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up187arrow-down1imageThe DMA already having an impact. Brave Browser installs surge after introduction of browser choice splash screen on iOS.lemmy.worldFatCat@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square194fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepHr34kY@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoThat graph is trash. The baseline needs to be at zero.
minus-squareArtVandelay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThat graph hurts my data scientist heart
minus-squareagelord@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoCould you please clarify why the baseline needs to be at 0? I’m genuinely curious.
minus-squareRoss_audio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down2·1 year agoNo it doesn’t. It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine. It’s not a scientific paper. It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph. That’s significant enough to shout about. Imagine any change you could make surprising competition by 25% in any market. That’s huge.
minus-squaregeissi@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 year ago It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph But you don’t get that percentage from looking at the graph. You get that from looking at the numbers. The graph height increases by 300% in the last 3 months 9 days.
minus-squareSorteKanin@feddit.dklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year ago It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine Define “perfectly fine”. It is clearly exaggerating the change. At a glance it looks more like a 5 times increase, not a 30% increase.
minus-squarePotatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoDid you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976, if these trends continue…AY!
minus-squareHobbes@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoYou could say the same about a 0.001 difference if you zoom in on the y-axis. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
minus-squareRoss_audio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoA 0.001 difference on a 0.004 total would be worth showing.
minus-squareHobbes@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThat was a bad example. Try 1,000,000 moving up to 1,000,069.
minus-squareRoss_audio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoI’m sticking with relevance. A >25% rise is what we’re talking about.
minus-squareHobbes@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoA 25% raise would show up with the y shits at zero. As would any significant increase.
That graph is trash. The baseline needs to be at zero.
That graph hurts my data scientist heart
Could you please clarify why the baseline needs to be at 0? I’m genuinely curious.
No it doesn’t.
It’s meant to illustrate a change and it does so perfectly fine. It’s not a scientific paper.
It’s a 32-34% increase looking at the graph. That’s significant enough to shout about.
Imagine any change you could make surprising competition by 25% in any market. That’s huge.
But you don’t get that percentage from looking at the graph. You get that from looking at the numbers.
The graph height increases by 300% in the last
3 months9 days.Define “perfectly fine”. It is clearly exaggerating the change. At a glance it looks more like a 5 times increase, not a 30% increase.
Did you know that disco record sales were up 400% for the year ending 1976, if these trends continue…AY!
You could say the same about a 0.001 difference if you zoom in on the y-axis. You don’t know what you’re talking about.
A 0.001 difference on a 0.004 total would be worth showing.
That was a bad example. Try 1,000,000 moving up to 1,000,069.
I’m sticking with relevance. A >25% rise is what we’re talking about.
A 25% raise would show up with the y shits at zero. As would any significant increase.