vegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agoFormer federal judge: Supreme Court ‘dangerously betrayed’ democracy with Trump disqualification decisionthehill.comexternal-linkmessage-square57fedilinkarrow-up1312arrow-down15
arrow-up1307arrow-down1external-linkFormer federal judge: Supreme Court ‘dangerously betrayed’ democracy with Trump disqualification decisionthehill.comvegeta@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square57fedilink
minus-squareCosmicomical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down5·1 year agoThe title makes it sound like the judge was in favour of trump, while it’s the opposite
minus-squareJohn_McMurray@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoNo. It might sound like that to someone with zero context tho.
minus-squareunreasonabro@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agowho isn’t in favour of dangerous betrayal though, seriously
minus-squareCosmicomical@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYes, without further context to me it sounds like it’s saying that supreme court betrayed democracy by disqualifying trump
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year agoThe further context of one of the most published Court decisions in a decade that you could read about in the article of you were still out of the loop?
The title makes it sound like the judge was in favour of trump, while it’s the opposite
Does it tho
No. It might sound like that to someone with zero context tho.
who isn’t in favour of dangerous betrayal though, seriously
Yes, without further context to me it sounds like it’s saying that supreme court betrayed democracy by disqualifying trump
The further context of one of the most published Court decisions in a decade that you could read about in the article of you were still out of the loop?