• Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Most customers would not be able to take advantage of this because they lack the skills to do so.

    • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      You don’t need every consumer to roll their own. If they’re obligated to provide server code, or an API, or whatever, stuff that sells at scale can be integrated into community projects. If you buy something obscure you might have issues, but you have options if you buy something mainstream and get the rug pulled.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Right, but what I’m saying is how many people do you think will be able to track down the new open-source project and connect it to their hardware?

        • Natanael@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Because if the community solutions are good enough then half the articles about the shutdown will mention it

        • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Word does spread and if there are enough of a group, people will likely setup 3rd party hosting solutions around supporting abandoned abut functional products.

          But the secondary effect is likely to be that companies support their products for much longer.

          • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If companies do that then it’s useful. Otherwise, open servers is a good thing, but is only a true solution for smart home hobbyists.