The New York Times reported that the plane was scheduled for a maintenance check over ongoing concerns, but Alaska Airlines chose to allow flights to go ahead.

  • june@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well that’s a hell of a development. This whole thing has been laid solely at the feet of Boeing when it was also Alaska’s fault.

    It started with the fucked up aircraft production.

    The finished with Alaska choosing not to perform maintenance it knew it needed.

    The good news is that this has brought to light some major deficiencies in both the aircraft manufacturing and airline maintenance failings. Two things that would not have been highlighted has Alaska done their due diligence and discovered this issue when they should have.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Air traffic safety is done in so many layers, usually when shit starts going visibly bad it means quite a few things have failed simultaneously.