• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    If anyone’s curious, it looks like you “hold the brake and swipe up” on a touchscreen area to go in drive, and “hold the brake and swipe down” to go into reverse.

    So yeah, it’s not a physical shifter, though it seems pretty intuitive and simple. BUT if you’re in reverse and try to swipe up to drive(like you’d do during a 3 point turn) , you have no feedback aside from looking at the screen to let you know it actually registered your shift.

    IMO this is another idiotic implementation at going cheap on physical controls or “being high tech fancy” that shouldn’t exist. It’s dumb to not have important functions give physical feedback while driving. I’m not laying most of the blame on tesla for this. It still sounds like she’s the one who really screwed herself, but I’d all but guarantee there’s going to be a lawsuit for this one, and rightly so. Fuck all this touch control crap in cars. It’s lousy enough just on the radios.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Anton Yelchin was also done in by a not too dissimilar feature. The gear shift of his vehicle returned to a “neutral position” after shifting so unless you looked at the letter indicator you may not realize what gear you’re in.

    • Thann@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Don’t forget the fancy electric door handles that stop working when you back into a pond.

      There are emergency override handles, but not everyone knows where they are or how to use them, so they’re not all that useful in an emergency.

      These deadly features are purely cosmetic, so I would lay a decent amount of blame is on tesla

      • Signtist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Stupid cosmetic designs have been an issue for a long time. There was a theater fire in Chicago in the early 1900’s where a bunch of people died because they couldn’t figure out how to use the fancy door handles while panicking and being crushed by everyone trying to get out. That’s the reason why exit doors on buildings with a high occupancy are now required to swing out, and have those pushbar locks that allow the door to open even if you’re just falling on it.

        If it’s possible that someone will need to use something while panicking, it needs to be as simple, intuitive, and failproof as possible

        • roguetrick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Wanted to chime in and clarify, the major issue there is you cannot operate a door handle in a crush, no matter how much of your senses you have. Can’t use a door handle if you can’t use your arms. Am drunk on the internet and hope this isn’t interpreted as a hostile reply.