If you’d approached the conversation honestly 2-3 replies ago, I’d be happy to provide sources.
Now you seem a boorish and rude troll, and you can go be that on someone else’s time.
If you’d approached the conversation honestly 2-3 replies ago, I’d be happy to provide sources.
Now you seem a boorish and rude troll, and you can go be that on someone else’s time.
On the first one, yes. This is the second one, that he’s failed to post bond for, and won’t be allowed to appeal unless he can.
The third was videotaped as he walked out of the verdict on the second.
If only he hadn’t publicly slandered the same person twice more after successfully being sued the first time.
I’m saying there’s independently verified, peer reviewed, and repeated research that show that many jobs keep or increase their productivity.
I don’t know if there’s any studies made specifically on framers, but machinists and manufacturers have been reported to, and of course almost anyone in a knowledge job.
If you mean that the common best practice of working 40 hrs/week is inefficient, then yes.
Governments aren’t pushing for 40 hr work weeks, socialists and industrialists of the early 1900s were, and the rest is conservatism.
You should probably update your economic knowledge.
Study after study over the last 20-30 years has shown that productivity remains or increases when switching from 40 hrs to 32.
What happened to Romans 13:1
They sure seemed eager to use that when Trump got into power.