Unfortunately, picking and choosing who gets to participate in democracy isn’t democracy. We’re stuck with morons among us.

(handy not included, you must bring your own)

More work than I wanted to do, but I appreciate your fact checking!

Big proponent of debt discharge. Also their infrastructure plan involves large erections. They’ve voted several times for beautifing the landscape. Their health plan encourages lots of pushups. Overall, it’s a platform many people would fall to their knees for.

Maybe Taylor Swift can explain it better: We are never ever ever getting different nominees.

These are the candidates. The end. And I would vote for a moldy cumsock if the alternative is Trump. But Biden has done surprisingly well given the hand (Congress and the supreme court) he was dealt. We could do so much worse.

I don’t see a glimmer of conscience in any of those pictures. I’d bet one of them was caught in a lie and was too dumb to shut up or think their way out of it (for which my bet is on contestant #6).

Not that baseless speculation is good for anything but killing a few minutes.

I hope the first step is to pop a shitload of popcorn.

Oh. Oh no. How… awful? My empathy is failing.

If it does, I hope Biden goes on a huge crime spree. I mean, that’s the endgame so might as well be entertained while the shop goes down.

I think it’s a schizophrenic break. Hopefully he gets his meds under control.

Telling what, exactly?

You’re overplaying your hand here. Parent/child incest implies rape if the child is underage. Adult sibling/underage sibling implies rape. But incest of siblings who are similar age (whether adult or child) doesn’t necessarily imply rape. Even incest of a parent and their adult child doesn’t imply rape.

Statistically I’d bet this is predominantly rape and you are largely correct, but by saying incest = rape you’ve overstepped a bit.

Read a little further. I might disagree with you about the overall capability/potential of AI, but I agree this is a great task to highlight its strengths.

Clearance doesn’t mean someone is particularly intelligent. But I agree a jury of clearance holders would probably have pretty strong ideas regarding proper handling of it, so the defense clearly doesn’t want that.

I’m looking forward to the Trump Cinematic Universe. Maybe they can finally get all their lore straight.

LLMs are still pretty limited, but I would agree with you that if there was a single task at which they can excel, it’s translating and summarizing. They also have much bigger contexts than 500 words. I think ChatGPT has a 32k token context which is certainly enough to summarize entire chapters at a time.

You’d definitely need to review the result by hand, but AI could suggest certain key things to look for.

So what I’m hearing is that in this particular case there will be consequences because it’s black-on-white crime.

Thanos was right!

Put another way: there are plenty of people who will eagerly issue death threats, stalk you, and swat you over minor differences in opinion. Think what they would do over serious money.

That’s an interesting take, thanks!