Donald Trump has no idea how to post bond in the fraud trial—and he’s absolutely losing it.

In just shy of a week, Donald Trump’s $454 million judgment from his New York bank fraud trial will become collectible, either by way of liquid cash or financial assets—and it has officially sent Trump into meltdown mode.

The notoriously sleep-deprived GOP presidential nominee spent the better part of Monday night shouting into the void about the massive, half-billion-dollar judgment and his apparent inability to pay it off, bemoaning being required to follow the law before being allowed to appeal the case.

“I would be forced to mortgage or sell Great Assets, perhaps at Fire Sale prices, and if and when I win the Appeal, they would be gone. Does that make sense? WITCH HUNT. ELECTION INTERFERENCE!” Trump posted Tuesday morning.

“I shouldn’t have to put up any money, being forced by the Corrupt Judge and AG, until the end of the appeal. That’s the way system works!” he added, forgetting that he’s being held to the same standards as every private citizen.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hopefully, during repossession, they count his obnoxious branding as negative value and underprice what is being auctioned.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      142
      ·
      9 months ago

      From my understanding, it essentially ends up with bidding for assets to get to the amount needed. Whatever the resulting high bid ends up, is the amount for that asset. So if something is valued at $500M but sells for only $200M, it only counts as $200M toward the judgment. Basically, estimated value means nothing, only what someone actually pays for it.

        • zurohki@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          9 months ago

          So… What happens when it turns out he’s underwater on all his properties, and they sell for less than he owes on them?

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            He defaults on the loans. If he owns a building, has a $500 M loan on it, and it gets sold via this process, he gets no money, unless the sale goes over what he owes for the judgement. But the loan is still in place and he still owes the $500 M.

        • MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Not necessarily, but more of what someone is willing to pay at that specific moment. A lot can factor in. This being highly publicized, and with the notoriety of Trump and its assets, it can go in any unexpected direction.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        So if something is valued at $500M but sells for only $200M, it only counts as $200M toward the judgment.

        Kind of less, he’s paying taxes on the sale too, because he’s still selling it even tho he doesnt get to keep the money.

        And when selling half a billion dollars of real estate, you’re going to pay a lot of taxes even in America.

        So the 200 million goes to the judgement, but he’s paying 20-40% percent in state/federal/local taxes. And it’s all gonna happen in the same calendar year while a shit ton of accountants are watching his every move.

        He’s going to end up having to sell a lot more than the judgement to pay his tax bill a year from now.

        And that’s not even getting into his loans.

        1. Value a building at 100 million when it’s worth 50

        2. Borrow 70 million on property.

        3. Sells for 40 and the bank needs 30 still.

        There’s no way out, even if the bank forgives the remaining 30, that still counts as taxable income for trump, compounding the first issue. And in that scenario, $0 is going to judgement and trump still loses the property and they move on to seizing the next on the list. He gets zero gain from the sale, but it’s still drives up taxable income for him personally

        trump could conceivably have a billion dollar gross income in 2024, and be completely broke with hundreds of millions due in tax.

        Which is just insane.

        • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          And yet, it is just. He has been screwing people over for decades to amass what he has, and it’s time he paid for his criminal (tax/loan/whatever fraud).

        • braveone@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s not quite right.

          If you buy something for 300m, with 200m in loans, and sell it for 250m, you pay the loan back first, and have 50m in losses. Your taxes go down.

          He only pays tax on gains.

          Remember the whole case is him inflating property value to get loans. Between the fire sale, and the bad loans, it’s very likely he has little to no equity. He could sell all he has and not have any money to pay the $500m (plus interest.) Which also means little to no tax burden.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Right…

            If he sells for less then he has a loan on, he still owes the money, and without the property as collateral, the lender is going to collect.

            If they forgive the debt, that counts as earnings and is taxed.

            So it would either force more sales to pay remaining loans, or it’s forgiven and taxable income goes up

          • Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 months ago

            But if he bought it for cheap, and got a loan on the property after the fact, or realistically, he held them for long enough then leveraged their new worth for other things, and hasn’t paid any gains on the properties

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Its possible at a firesale value it could end up being a capital loss. There wouldn’t be any taxes then.

          But you’d need a legit appraisal to even know if it’s a loss, his appraisals are worthless