He was already known as a sleazy conman and the butt of jokes for decades before he won in 2016. How could they not know?

Yeah right. As soon as a war started up, legislators like Ted Cruz would hop on the first plane to Cancun.

Our legislators don’t want that though. In fact they’re currently trying to force the sale of US TikTok to a US company likely so they can collect even more data on us.

McDonalds bacon egg and cheese bagel along with Jack in the Box’s ciabatta breakfast sandwich.

It won’t happen with our two party system. We’re stuck with the Republican party until the sun burns out.

Do you find them on YouTube? I didn’t even know such a thing existed.

It’s interesting how a single letter can entirely change the meaning of a comment.

If you don’t pay property tax, the city/county will seize it and auction it off to pay the bill.

Especially in a 3:1 fight?

It ain’t easy being sleazy.

No offense, but I can’t help but picture Michael Scott’s wall mounted TV when reading about your 21" monitor as a bedroom TV.

I think you could liken it to robbing a bank to obtain money versus scamming a bunch of elderly people to obtain money. Both give you the same end result but each crime is treated differently.

Can we elect the EU to be our next president instead of the current crop of political windbags?

If they utter “security for children” the government will probably not only drop the lawsuit but pay Apple $20 billion.

How about the continued election tallies claiming 80%-90% voted for Putin? That seems like a major red flag

Humans can more easily be tampered with (or just be dumb).

I didn’t see that distinction anywhere in the comment and OP was downvoted when they proposed a scenario where a regular person is temporarily gone from their home. This whole idea is quite absurd to be honest and doubly so for the way the proponents here seem to feel so smug and morally superior when suggesting it.

Do you extend this sentiment to vehicles too? If I drive to work and park my car there, is it morally correct for someone to come steal it because they want to drive somewhere or sleep in it but don’t have a car? After all, it’s just sitting there unused, so I must be some entitled asshole for expecting it to be there when I’m ready to head home, right?

I also find it funny you chose the words parasitical and greedy when these squatters are quite literally feeding off the homeowners and selfishly taking something that doesn’t belong to them. Your argument is not too different from a CEO who wants to cut worker pay and give himself a bigger bonus with the money.

The legal world takes longer because courts are backed up and it can take months to get any resolution.

People don’t just sign leases to their friend because the intent here is to have him move into the home. Unless your friend is willing to move in in order to drive these people out, your plan won’t work.

The lease allows him to live in the house despite the squatters illegally occupying the home. How can you honestly question whether the home owner is breaking the law when the squatters have no legal right to live in the home in the first place?

Or you buy a new house, and while your old house is on the market for sale, someone breaks in and claims it as their own while you’re stuck paying for it, can’t sell it, and run the risk of having it completely trashed.