This nonsense is more bullshit propagated by the fake news about Biden having anything to do with the retreat signed and ordered by Donald Trump.
Propagandists can fuck off or address reality if they want to be included in the conversation.
Fake News, Biden didn’t pull us out of Afghanistan.
Sounds like you want to change topics from your whole lies bit for some reason? Weird. Changing your defense from it being lies and a limited resource while not admitting the predatory nature of this game design. I dont care to argue your new bad faith points as you did not take the last stance fairly. I can’t stand predatory microtransactions. The arrogance of people who don’t care about it invading the game just allow further shit like this to fester.
I guess if we’re changing topics, we can focus on the predatory character customization microtransaction. They locked any new saves or character creation to limit people to a microtransaction. That’s pretty fucked up too.
Or we can go into Capcoms’ recent attempts to take down mods from their old games. https://readwrite.com/capcom-backtracks-quickly-and-removes-drm-after-players-rebel/
There are plenty of problematic things to hit on here.
Have you tried to turn a circle in the main city on low settings?
Except having limited access to a resource is from the original game.
The original game that ultimately saw success in its “Dark Arisen” release that had an eternal ferrystone.
Don’t go trying to redefine history here, I played both copies of the original.
There’s this lie being sold online that it was an intentional decision for DD2 to try and sell more microtransactions, but limited fast travel is a hallmark of the original Dragon’s Dogma.
There is no lie in the complaints. Ferrystones are not a limited resource in Dragons Dogma 2. You just have to pay microtransactions for it. You are lying about the game to defend it. To me, this level of denial comes off as coping.
I want you to admit that ferrystones are not a limited resource in Dark Arisen and same with Dragons dogma 2. And I want you to admit the differences in how they are offered to the player.
Or go lie to somebody else.
Having limited access to a resource to then hook you on microtransactions is from mobile game design. It’s literally a freemium mechanic being put into an already upscaled price game.
It’s one of the most abusive and addictive ways to develop a game, and you want to portray that positively.
I fucking hate gamers. We’ve been having this conversation since the horse Armor DLC for Oblivion yet here we fucking are.
Portcrystals are not the same thing as ferrystones and are useless without them.
You are speaking from ignorance.
They give you some ferrystones in the game as well, but it is artificially limited to force microtransactions into a single-player game. It literally goes against the design of the game.
This shit should be illegal.
How did none of the critic reviews catch any of these issues?
We can start another billboard race on top of already oversized vehicles.
A lot of people carry a button that makes their car beep. That’s the fix. Or maybe people who can’t find a vehicle in a parking lot shouldn’t be driving multiple tons of metal around?
I’m going to hold you responsible for defending them from criticism they need to face. You are creating a safe space for abusive ideologies to fester.
Despite this, shame is still a valid application of positive punishment to active participants of an abusive subgroup.
Go be the carrot to somebody who needs a philosophy 101 course to justify defending actively harmful forms of propoganda from criticism. I’m not your guy, I have my own objectives in this discourse.
Ultimately, none of this invalidates the observation of an ironic use of a victim complex.
I didn’t say anything about immunity to propaganda.
Feel free to address what I said, though. I’m mocking the ironic victim complex of abusive individuals.
This statement is an immediate bannable offense in many places, but the 2nd amendment allows for firearm ownership. Many states have stand your ground or home defense laws supporting lethal home defense. In America, our founding is justified by the need for violent resistance against tyrannical governments.
I know these aren’t directly contradictory things, but it feels like doublespeak, the way the topics are viewed.
its the world’s fault for me being a complete piece of shit
Lmao, the victim complex of the most abusive subgroup of men on the planet is hilarious.
Defending violence from the bland corporate talking points of non-violent resistance.
People will say the dumbest “violence is never the answer” and then get upset when you point out they clearly don’t believe that.
Texas and Florida have been using state emergency funds to pay private companies 10000x markup to ship illegal immigrants around the nation for over a year and have not been charged for it. They are lying about jobs to trick migrants into this plot. This falls under the terms for human trafficking.
So no, it’s perfectly legal for a state to move migrants around. Especially if you are not coercing them.
Lmao, can’t even stop changing the comments after saying bye.
Sorry you expect people to read your mind instead of your words.
Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?
Your comment is junk.
So basic critical thinking makes clear the scope of my discussion. Sorry this confused you.
Don’t be a hostile prick if you don’t want a hostile chat. Of course, you cry victim after being disrespectful to everything said to you.
The word never is not for singular occurrences lmao.
But whatever 5 page bullshit narrative you need to weave to feel better, have at it.
You don’t read so good
Nobody except you is confused about what the other person is saying.