3volver@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoDoes this plan make sense? v3lemmy.worldimagemessage-square429linkfedilinkarrow-up1718arrow-down186
arrow-up1632arrow-down1imageDoes this plan make sense? v3lemmy.world3volver@lemmy.world to General Discussion@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square429linkfedilink
minus-squaretyler@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoCondorcet is not either of those things but it’s better than some. V321 or STAR outperform all other voting methods by large margins, especially with resistance to strategic voting and manipulation. https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/
minus-squareFractalsInfinite@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoQuite an interesting resource. While I can not determine how accurate the simulation is to reality, it appears that the methods you outline are in fact 5% better at dealing with situations with high strategic voting.
Condorcet is not either of those things but it’s better than some. V321 or STAR outperform all other voting methods by large margins, especially with resistance to strategic voting and manipulation. https://electionscience.github.io/vse-sim/
Quite an interesting resource. While I can not determine how accurate the simulation is to reality, it appears that the methods you outline are in fact 5% better at dealing with situations with high strategic voting.