• HollowNaught@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I always roll my eyes whenever I see a “you can’t do that because you’re a woman” character in a show, and then I’m always reminded that these people actually exist

    • booly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      these people actually exist

      The way it’s been explained to me is that so much of the negative interactions in life come from a tiny, tiny number of offenders who manage to be shitty to dozens and dozens of people. So anyone who has to interact with many different people will inevitably encounter that shitty interaction, while most of us normies would never actually behave in that way.

      Of the literally thousands of times I’ve interacted with a server or cashier, I’ve never yelled at one. But talk to any server or cashier, and they’ll all have stories of the customer who yelled at them. In other words, it can be simultaneously true that:

      • Almost all servers and cashiers get yelled at by customers.
      • Very, very, few customers actually yell at servers or cashiers.

      In other words, our lived experiences are very different, depending on which side of that interaction we might possibly be on.

      When I talk to women in male dominated fields, basically every single one of them has shitty stories about sexist mistreatment. It’s basically inevitable, because they are a woman who interacts with literally hundreds or thousands in their field. And even if I interact with hundreds or thousands of women in that same field, just because I don’t mistreat any of them doesn’t mean that my experienced sample is representative.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        I wouldn’t say very few. I’d say a solid 10% of people are routinely rude, impatient or entitled in a retail or restaurant setting. Even higher in some places.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          I think you’re right. People want to believe that humans are good but in reality a huge number are deeply broken.

          Fixed an autocorrect in edit.

          • Wandering_Uncertainty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It really is a matter of perspective.

            You’re saying that 10% of the population being awful means that a “huge number” are deeply broken.

            So then 90% are being good! Mind, it doesn’t take too many assholes to wreck things for everyone, but it is nice that the majority of folks really are trying to do their best. A sizeable majority, even!

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              10% of 8 billion is still many hundreds of millions. That’s a huge number. More: it’s a number we have to stop pretending is not a big deal and get to work to fix ourselves as a species.

              • Wandering_Uncertainty@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                Oh, no denying that at all. It is a problem, especially in aggregate.

                When looking at the big picture, those rotten apples really do spoil the bunch and it can be depressing.

                But also people can take that big picture awareness of problems and hate on people a little universally. Saying things like humanity is awful and a plague on the earth and maybe shouldn’t exist. There’s absolutely reason to see things that way.

                But we are also a species that dolphins can approach for help when they’re injured. Or that will fight tooth and nail to help a wild creature. Or who will sacrifice their own well-being, not just for friends and family, but for strangers. Who will take other creatures, like dogs, into our homes and hearts and love them with all we have.

                We can suck as a species, absolutely. We need to fix it. But it’s important to remember the joys of humanity, and not just the failures. Both are extreme, for we are a rather extreme species!

        • Acamon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Maybe in some places. But when I go out to a restaurant, I’m often surrounded by a few dozen other diners, and no one is acting up or shouting at waiting staff. I have seen customers be obviously rude to staff but it’s very rare compared to the number of “normal” interactions. Sure not everyone is friendly and totally polite, but entitled, shouting or just being an ass is an absolute exception, like less than 0.1%. I also worked as a waiter in a couple of different restaurants over a two year period, and don’t remember any incidents either to me or my colleagues.

          When I read comments like this it makes me wonder if I’ve been lucky enough to live and work in decent places, and the USA is just an nightmare hellscape, or if the reality there is much more normal and we just hear an unrepresentative sample of it.

      • Wanderer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I seen first hand examples of something happening like women being interrupted by men and they go on about how everything is sexist and they were mistreated. But in that exact same meeting multiple guys talked over multiple other guys. It just happens, not everything is sexist but a lot of people claim sexism when it isn’t.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think you’re right that only a tiny minority are directly responsible for the negative interactions, but as someone within academic science, there’s also a much larger chunk of people who don’t challenge the assholes or the systemic fuckery when they see it.

        Minorities who face oppression are much more likely to be ignored if they report inappropriate or offensive behaviour; I directly know people who have been made to feel like they are the problem for highlighting a problem. This is especially common if it’s an established and respected academic who makes the iffy comments, because there’s a tendency to them like a senile grandparent at Christmas. If they’re a professor emeritus, there’s a sense of them not really being relevant anymore, even if they’re still respected, but it can feel tremendously isolating to see no-one step in to challenge the comments, either at an individual or institutional level.

        It’s understandable to not want to rock the boat, but abstaining is easier for some than others.

        • booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I agree.

          I point out that pretty much everyone in that group experiences it, so even those who aren’t in that disadvantaged group should show some empathy towards the experiences of others, that we may never directly encounter ourselves. Part of that empathy, of course, is to provide support and structures for reducing the likelihood that these things happen, and mitigating them when they do happen.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 months ago

            someone missed your joke about one person having multiple penises. or maybe they’re really progressive and are looking out for their multipenile friends.

            • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Look, if one of you knows a guy (or a gal) rocking hemis and you’ve been holding out, I’m gonna lump you up with a Louisville Slugger on my Johnny Dangerous shit.

          • 🦄🦄🦄@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Lol the dudebros getting mad about only having a boring male penis instead of a cute female one and downvoting you.

            • SUPAVILLAIN@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Oh, I don’t think it’s that. I think it’s two parts actually comradely queers considering him a chaser, and two parts he’s an absolute self-aggrandizing waste of time who thinks he’s the “better class of socialist” compared to us when “degenerate” is an active part of his vocabulary and he just can’t stop parroting the State Department.

              The only “socialists” that align with NATO are the same ones making excuses for the kinds of things on Vaush’s computer is the last I’mma say on that.

    • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not only that they exist but also that they’re disturbingly common and disproportionately in positions of power.

    • bloom_of_rakes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      We poke fun at your infatuation for these infantile cartoons. You reply, “misogyny!!”

      The only reason your cries are taken seriously here is that so many of these people are on the same dumb wavelength.