• Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    A more appropriate headline would be “a motion to consider ousting Speaker Johnson.”

    She’s grandstanding. She could have kicked off a vote, but she did not.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Well she filed the motion to vacate. Iirc that’s the first step in the process; and they may not advance to the next step. Either way, she’s throwing a hissy fit because 9 republicans don’t actually qualify as a majority and she sucks at math.

      I assume it’s only a matter of time before he’s gone.

      Basically, the only question I have is will the dems vote against Johnson again?

      • Reptorian@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Basically, the only question I have is will the dems vote against Johnson again?

        Depends. If they’re doing it for giving aid to Ukraine, and keeping the government up, I’d be for keeping Johnson. Until he’s no longer useful.

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Which the real question is how many more republicans resign?

          If they have enough jump ship, that the can get a reasonable majority …. They absolutely will.