• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was explaining how they’re the same. You know, for someone who likes explaining the obvious, you really did miss out on this obvious point being made, twice.

    • jumjummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      So because the US vetoed a measure earlier, them proposing a ceasefire now is grounds for Russia/China to veto?

      You sound like someone who thinks “no u” is a strong argument.

      • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        They vetoing it because the US proposed a conditional ceasefire while Russia and China want an immediate unconditional ceasefire.