Mozilla says “customer data was never at risk.”
  • Mozilla ends partnership with Onerep due to CEO’s ties to data broker
  • Onerep’s data removal service bundled into Mozilla’s Monitor Plus subscription
  • Onerep CEO admits to owning people-search websites, leading to end of partnership with Mozilla. Transition plan in progress.
  • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
    1315·
    9 months ago

    This is fantastic. That said, Mozilla should really reconsider their own CEO too.

    • Manalith@midwest.socialEnglish
      40·
      9 months ago

      Are you referring to the foundation president Mark Surman or the corporation CEO Laura Chambers? She seems to be an interim position holder, so I guess whatcha referring to?

      • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
        39·
        9 months ago

        Laura. Her past affiliations are concerning. I’m aware she’s seated on an interim position, but I can’t imagine that there weren’t any better candidates.

        • ripcord@lemmy.worldEnglish
          72·
          9 months ago

          Ok, that’s why she’s interim and they’re looking for someone else.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          9 months ago

          Not everything in her past is stuff I like, am interested in, or agree with, but I don’t see anything in her history that means she can’t be a CEO or that her appointment should concern me.

          What has she done that makes you worry?

          • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2·
            9 months ago

            It’s not her actions, it’s her past workplaces. AirBnB in particular is concerning. It’s not exactly a secret that thanks to AirBnBs business model, and the lack of regulation of it, that the housing markets in several countries have gotten fucked completely. Something she chose to work with and directly support.

            I somehow rank the right to have a place to live slightly above the right to have open access to the internet (though not by much), and as such I wouldn’t want anyone with her affiliations in any such senior position at Mozilla, temporary or no.

      • EdibleFriend@lemmy.worldEnglish
        328·
        9 months ago

        Pretty sure he’s saying there should be no ultimate head. Which…umm…if you get rid of CEO then someone below them is in charge and then you just keep cutting people until nobody is left lol

        • Dojan@lemmy.worldEnglish
          21·
          9 months ago

          That’s not at all what I said. You’re conflating my comment with that of someone else.

        • Manalith@midwest.socialEnglish
          4·
          9 months ago

          Maybe I’m wrong, but it seems like for the most part, at least for big decisions, the corporation answers to the foundation which is more of a commitee anyway. Maybe they’re kept more separate than that, but that’s the impression that I got.

    • Noxy@yiffit.netEnglish
      1138·
      9 months ago

      They should not have a CEO, period. Useless do-nothing job.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        61·
        9 months ago

        It’s always funny to see someone who thinks they know how it works but in reality has no clue whatsoever how it works.