• imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Many times. It’s never as rewarding as you’d like, because the other party is rarely objective, and thus rarely acknowledges their defeat.

    It’s usually better to ease up when you get close to a total victory and allow the opponent to save face.

    After all, no matter how objectively correct you are, if you don’t change the other person’s position even a little, you’re just wasting time.

    • EmoDuck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      IMO it’s even worse when the other party admits to their mistakes and apologizes.

      Takes out all the wind of your sails

      • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am someone who does that because I’m objective enough to recognize my own fallibility and that if I’m presented with reasonable and logical evidence, i will accept it and change my perspective.

        It also usually stops fighting and helps progress to a constructive discussion.

        • TheDoozer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I do that, too, and I regularly get the “you’re always right, I’m always wrong” commentary. I respond, no, I’m often wrong, I just don’t make a big deal out of it so you don’t notice. I’d be happy to move on without a fuss when you’re wrong, too, if you’ll allow it.

          Because seriously, being wrong is not a big deal. Everybody is wrong at some point, and regularly. Just correct yourself and move on, it’s not a hit to your identity or person.