Walt Disney Co on Friday said that remarks by activist investor Nelson Peltz criticizing the company for making movies dominated by female and Black actors is evidence that he shouldn’t be on Disney’s board.

Peltz, whose fight to join Disney as a director has become one of the year’s most bitter and closely watched board battles, in an interview with the Financial Times said Disney’s films have become too focused on delivering a message, and not enough on quality storytelling. He specifically took issue with “The Marvels” and “Black Panther.”

“Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women? Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that?" Peltz said in the interview, published on Friday. "Why can’t I have Marvels that are both? Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

Asked about Peltz’s remarks, a Disney spokesperson responded: “This is exactly why Nelson Peltz shouldn’t be anywhere near a creatively driven company.”

  • hddsx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know much about Peltz but I kind of agree that you don’t NEED to have all black or all women cast. The art should dictate it. But on the flip side, having an all black or all women cast isn’t necessarily a bad thing. Representation in media may not matter to some, but it can make a big impact on others.

    Furthermore, most of Africa is black. What were you expecting out of Black Panther???

    • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s like making a movie about Themyscira, (DC I know) and having one of the main characters be a man.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s been a minute since I saw Black Panther. But didn’t they shoehorn Martin Freeman’s character to add some white diversity as a token white guy?

      • roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        Everett Ross is associated with Black Panther in the comics as well… And is basically a token there. But his existence predates the Disney acquisition.

    • desentizised@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I get your point but I mean Wakanda is supposed to be the most technologically advanced society. Why shouldn’t diversity sort of be a given in that context? Because only fellow Africans can be trusted to keep the place a secret?

      • MiltownClowns@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, yeah. Do you not know the history of Black Panther? You just talking out your ass? The whole idea was isolationism in the face of colonialism.

      • Blueberrydreamer@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        They completely cut off their society from the rest of the world, it’s not like any African gets a pass in, they don’t allow anyone that isn’t Wakandan. It was like, a pretty significant plot point.