• KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    You should probably update your economic knowledge.

    Study after study over the last 20-30 years has shown that productivity remains or increases when switching from 40 hrs to 32.

    • Guntrigger@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      No no no, hours = productivity.

      Monkey types on typewriter for more time, monkey write more code. All top quality. Best code.

    • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      And that would be under the government is propping up companies that are that ineffient.

      • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you mean that the common best practice of working 40 hrs/week is inefficient, then yes.

        Governments aren’t pushing for 40 hr work weeks, socialists and industrialists of the early 1900s were, and the rest is conservatism.

          • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            I don’t know if there’s any studies made specifically on framers, but machinists and manufacturers have been reported to, and of course almost anyone in a knowledge job.

              • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’m saying there’s independently verified, peer reviewed, and repeated research that show that many jobs keep or increase their productivity.

                • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  So then you would need to dive into why that is true. I actually agree with you because I had a job like that when I was not self employed. And the reason I could be ineffient was because it was directly government funded. The only reason a machinest and manufacturing job can be ineffeicinet is because of government involvement.

                  • KidnappedByKitties@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    If you’d approached the conversation honestly 2-3 replies ago, I’d be happy to provide sources.

                    Now you seem a boorish and rude troll, and you can go be that on someone else’s time.