I am not a native English speaker and I have sometimes referred to people as male and female (as that is what I have been taught) but I have received some backlash in some cases, especially for the word “female”, is there some negative thought in the word which I am unaware of?

I don’t know if this is the best place to ask, if it’s not appropriate I have no problem to delete it ^^

  • locuester@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Sensitivities during Covid ran high. A lot of things changed then. For instance in the software world removing the name “master” from git usage, and on the TV Show Survivor, the host not saying his famous line “come on in guys”. At the same time pronouns became a huge thing, and these seemingly gender specific or sensitive word terms were targeted.

    You are correct, there was a round of this in the 90s or so, where job titles like “waitress”, “stewardess”, “policeman” were all adjusted. I see that as a very different round of language change.

    • Vanth@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      GitHub changed their terminology in ~2020, but it’s been a controversial term for years before that. I remember master/slave hard drive terminology being set aside in early 2010s. And I was just grunt level, hourly IT at the time.

      • locuester@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yeah, 2020 is the time period I’m referring to. I had never heard of it being a thing until George Floyd and BLM movement in 2020, then GitHub changed in response to that.

        I’ve been in IT for 35 years. And I never heard a single negative thing about branch names and master/slave terminology until 2020.

        Perhaps you think that was set aside because IDE hard drives are dead.

        • Vanth@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          It goes even further back than I was aware, to 2003.

          http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/3243656.stm

          My sticking point in your original statement is that all this “sensitivity” is new, allegedly aligning with covid and George Floyd and BLM. That’s not the case and it minimizes the decades of work people have spent trying to influence language to be more inclusive.

          3 years ago may be when pearl-clutchers started reaching a critical volume to where media saw the dollar signs in catering to them.

          • locuester@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            All this sensitivity being mainstream is new to me. It came from all angles in all aspects of life very suddenly.

            Yes you can find some things happening in the past, but sweeping changes were made in the 2020-2022 timeframe.

            That fact doesn’t minimize anyone’s prior efforts, thoughts, feelings, actions, movements, or otherwise. The attempts to fix the English collective masculine date back to 1795.

            As early as 1795, dissatisfaction with the convention of the collective masculine led to calls for gender-neutral pronouns, and attempts to invent pronouns for this purpose date back to at least 1850, although the use of singular they as a natural gender-neutral pronoun in English has persisted since the 14th century.