New survey suggests decline has strong correlation between Christian nationalism and opposition to inclusive policies

Public support for same-sex marriage and nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ+ Americans has fallen, even as the overall share remains high, according to new findings by the nonpartisan Public Religion Research Institute.

Broad majorities of Americans, regardless of political party or faith, continue to support LGBTQ+ rights and protections, the analysis found. But after years of rising public support, the decline is notable, said Melissa Deckman, CEO of the PRRI.

The survey analyzed Americans’ attitudes toward LGBTQ+ rights across three policies: same-sex marriage, nondiscrimination protections and religion-based service refusals. It found support for all three measures had softened for the first time since the PRRI began tracking views of the issues nearly a decade ago.

While the “vast majority of Americans continue to endorse protections for LGBTQ Americans”, Deckman said the results may serve as a “warning sign” for those working to safeguard the rights of LGBTQ+ Americans amid a conservative legislative and legal effort to erode them.

  • admiralteal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The moderate/centrist position between “kill the gays” and “don’t permit the killing of gays” is “kill some of the gays.”

    That’s all there is to it. If you are a moderate on this issue, you’re a violent bigot.

    • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      The moderate/centrist position

      Soooooo tired of people incorrectly simplifying what a centrist would believe by taking the extreme ends and picking the exact middle stance. That’s almost never how you get to a centrist view and it’s a great way to ostracize them.

      A centrist on gay rights likely sees that marriage is legal, culturally it’s acceptable, so why should they fight for more rights, they’re already equal?

      I don’t agree with this stance, but you’ll notice it’s not a “violent bigot” stance, just an ignorant one.

      • psvrh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which is true, but the apparent centrists give oxygen to the extremist position, which in turns gives that extremist view false legitimacy.

        The very existence of centrism on this topic implies that there’s some kind of queer supremacy movement that has anything like the traction in popular culture that homophobia and transphobia have, which isn’t the case. There’s no centrist position, here, there’s a humanist position, and then there’s a pack of retrograde bigots and the grifters that are weaponizing them, and as soon as centrists recognize that and start outright condemning these people and their views, the better.

        • iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s the fallacy of the excluded middle.

          The centrist position is something like “lgbt people should not be discriminated against, but trans people can’t demand to be included into women’s sports”

          Let’s not pretend that everything is simple and there’s no nuance and complications in life