Federal income tax currently maxes at 37%
Federal income tax currently maxes at 37%
I want to laugh but it hurts.
That’s part of why we need viable rail travel in the US.
Skorjden’s disease is an autoimmune disease that attacks salivary glands. It is a large part of why Venus Williams had to retire. I don’t believe there’s any noticeable caloric difference though research would mostly be on the other effects of disease.
Well in the above scenario NY and CA still aren’t shipping them to other states using lies and without telling the receiving state.
None of the rich ones want to pony up that much for nothing and the poor ones have already spent what they had on his other legal costs and “merch”.
Now that is a thought. Instead of AI doing a skynet/terminator thing it gets to the point we trust it and then tells us to eat or do things that kill us.
No need for nitty gritty, ignoring laws and courts is what dictators do. The hhs secretary is the one to determine a national health emergency and by law can only do so for a disease or disorder. Pregnancy is neither.
Acting like he hasn’t done anything besides not be Trump is disingenuous at best especially considering the congresses he’s had to work with.
Hope not, if it goes down low enough maybe someone reasonable can buy it out.
Whoever determines awardees must be a MAGAt. Everyone on that list besides Martha Stewart is a hard-right fucko who is against everything RBG advocated for through her life.
When a paper is far enough outside of my field I’m not going to be knowledgeable enough to critique methods. I’m not “new to the field” in the sense that I’m starting research in that area. Just thought the title was interesting/cool and I want to know a little bit more about the specifics. I don’t actually care about the field enough to study it (if I did I’d look for a review). So I’m not trying to understand the field but the just the paper(broadly). Why is the thing they study important? How did they (supposedly) come to their hypothesis? Just how badly is a news report overreaching what the source states? Etc.
There’ll always be someone new to the field who does actually have to read the intro. I read a stuff outside of my field all the time and I rely on the intro to not have to go find a review just to broadly understand a given paper.
EU and maybe gdpr and other similar regulation matter. The US hasn’t updated our regulations on the tech sector, we’re like 30y behind.