“There’s this wild disconnect between what people are experiencing and what economists are experiencing,” says Nikki Cimino, a recruiter in Denver.

  • voracitude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    What OP is probably saying is that if you have a certain income level and then you choose to take on a debt that you’re going to have trouble paying back, that’s mistake that you made and should have seen coming

    If that’s what they’d said, I wouldn’t take issue with it. Of course a person has to do the maths, buying a home isn’t a light decision. But the size of the purchase isn’t at all related to living cheque to cheque, which was in the words they chose.

      • voracitude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Because the purchase is broken up into installments and paid back monthly. That is why, despite my home being the most expensive thing I have ever purchased, I am not living cheque to cheque. If her problem were the size of the purchase alone, then I too would be living cheque to cheque and so would all other homeowners with mortgages.

        Edit: I should point out that my cost of living has actually dropped since I bought my home, because I did the maths to be sure it would. Most expensive purchase of my life saved me money. Go figure, right?