Good, but… only “certain” sexual assaults? Fucking what?

Sounds like these preachers want their tax-exempt status revoked.

While I agree that should be the case, what makes you think it will be? The Supreme Court just ruled the Constitution doesn’t matter.

Micro transactions

They did fucking what

Goddamnit. At least I have most of Dark Arisen still in front of me; I slept on it for years because of Dark Souls/Elden Ring, Starsector, BG3, etc., but it’s really grabbing me lately.

Because the truth fucks, homie.

The traitor is worse, obviously. This is easier than man, woman, camera… WHALE

That’s generous. Idealised concepts are more important than people to the Republican party.

Oh boy, you think this is the worst thing America has done, even this week? Now I don’t know if I should tell you about the rest…

Do they not know? Or don’t care?

Some people one, some people the other, some people both.

Ahh, “but what about”. Not “That’s not true, here’s proof”. Interesting approach, even if ineffective.

They’ve still been offshoring all data to China in contravention of direct orders to stop. Your right to be a moron doesn’t extend to compromising national security, not sorry.

No, the concern is not what people will see on TikTok but what data TikTok is offshoring from their devices to servers in China. It’s a massive surveillance operation.

Now, why would you be trying to dress this up as a free speech issue, I wonder?

deleted by creator

Does the liner contribute to microplastics in whatever is contained? Genuine question, that’d be a point against the epoxy liner. Of course any solution would have to include an effective replacement, so 🤷 Wax, maybe?

Bomb threat

Now that I have the DOJ’s attention: Do us all a favour and tell Garland that this is his fucking fault for not accelerating this shit into court with the pedal to the metal immediately after Biden took office.

This lot are indubitably amongst those actively calling the teachings of Jesus “weak” so yeah, definitely not Christians.

People and elephants have lived together for centuries, millennia even. They’re only getting violent because of us. People best stop killing elephants, and hope the elephants haven’t figured out climate change is our fault too.

It’s the fact that she can’t figure it out that’s her problem, not the fact that she bought something big. She could have done the same with beanie babies at $20 a pop and run up a hundred thousand in debt over the course of two, three, four years, whatever. She’d be in the same situation, but without a house. The problem is not the purchase, it’s that she’s bad with money, jesus fuck it’s like nobody on this fucking website understands how logic works.

Tell you what, I’m gonna block you now because you’re giving me brain cancer with all this exposure to your idiocy, so don’t worry about responding; I won’t see it.

I am not saying that at all. I’m saying that “the largest purchase of my life” is not the reason for living cheque to cheque. It’s bad budgeting.

As an analogy, you’re insisting the fall is what kills someone, and I’m insisting it’s the sudden stop at the end. Because it is the sudden stop at the end. If just falling killed people, that Red Bull guy woulda died. If just making a large purchase put people in poverty, I would be too.

I did the maths before I purchased my home. The maths should inform the size of the purchase, not the other way around. I don’t get why you lot insist the problem is just how much she bought, rather than the fact that she didn’t do the maths.