• hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I was explaining how they’re the same. You know, for someone who likes explaining the obvious, you really did miss out on this obvious point being made, twice.

      • jumjummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        So because the US vetoed a measure earlier, them proposing a ceasefire now is grounds for Russia/China to veto?

        You sound like someone who thinks “no u” is a strong argument.

        • metaldream@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          They vetoing it because the US proposed a conditional ceasefire while Russia and China want an immediate unconditional ceasefire.