Feel free to elaborate on the topic!

  • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m old enough to remember him as the King of Pop, but young enough that I can’t remember him not being a weirdo. I respect the music, but was never a fan. (For context)

    To me it always felt like he was trying to reclaim his childhood. His father was horrible to those kids and worked them to the bone. As a billionaire adult he was able to do ALL the things that every kid dreams of, like having an amusement park in your backyard, and a pet chimp. He shared his stuff with other child stars that he probably could relate to. I honestly believe he was just having sleep overs with his friends.

  • Teknikal@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m going to say I honestly don’t know but the guy was definetly messed in the head but I think he was a talent I’m not going to judge him because I really do not know (would I let any kid of mine sleep over him, no I wouldn’t but that goes for anyone else as well) .

    Jimmy Saville on the other hand is hopefully in hell.

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    He was a deeply damaged, deeply odd man, and he definitely had no sense of what was socially appropriate, but I have literally no idea if he took sexual gratification from it all or committed any crimes. He was the absolute poster child for “reasonable doubt.”

    Wouldn’t let my kid sleep over, though.

  • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Meh, since there are so many false claims about famous people, ways to profit and get an audience by making allegations… I think it’s really hard to tell. Seems established fact that he was a creep. And gathered children around because of some mental illness, to compensate for his own childhood that he didn’t have. That doesn’t automatically mean he abused them. And he wasn’t convicted of anything. I say: can’t tell, in dubio pro reo, but I wouldn’t let kids anywhere near people like that.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    No he didn’t. His energy was pure kindness. He was a child inside which is why he liked being around children. There was nothing sexual about it.

  • Edward Internethands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t know, I just chalk it up to another L on the genius-madness scoreboard. We’ll always have some fond memories of before he went off the deep end.

  • Brutticus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m too young to remember Jackomania. In my politically moderate (by US standards) upbringing, he was the subject of many deeply racist, transphobic jokes, all juxtaposed with the child molestation thing. I dont really have any other memory of him, aside from the simpsons episode of him (made at the height of Jackomaia).

    That all being said, any expectations I have were set by Talking Simpsons, and the fact that that is the only episode not on Disney+. The episode was very much made at Jackson’s insistence. He had an unhealthy obsession with Bart Simpson, and the episode itself was made with his intention to lure more boys in. It was very much selling the fantasy of being plucked from obscurity by Jackson-as-sexless-music-elf, and you, a little boy, could stay up all night writing the next pop hit. A few of his victims even cited the episode, and one detail that stuck with me was that Jackson would invite boys over with their sisters, as cover.

    Jackson had a deeply traumatic upbringing in the public eye, and I cant imagine the fame or racism went down easy, especially when that venom was all he knew. But there is no doubt in my mind that he did molest little boys.