• Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yes, the cause of most of this is the hardliners that put Bibi in power and keeps him there to this day. I would question the apartheid moniker since Israel is fairly diverse. It has something like 40% Arab population who also serve in the IDF. It has the most diverse populations in that part of the world.

    • JoBo@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The Arabs who serve in the military, other than Jewish Arabs, are Bedouin and Druze, whose ‘community leaders’ chose to participate in conscription because military service is fundamental to success in Israeli society. Palestinians often regard them as the worst, not because of a sense of betrayal but because Arabs in the IDF often feel the need to prove which side they’re on. The Israeli refuseniks are, for the most part, able to refuse because their family is willing and able to support them economically.

      Palestinian-Israelis do not (and cannot) serve in the military, along with the most extreme in the settler-movement ( a sore point for many Israelis, who are forced to do national service to keep these extremists safe in occupied territory).

      The apartheid charge is (largely) based on the different laws and rights which apply to citizens of Israel vs Palestinians under occupation. Israel does treat its Arab citizens and, especially, East Jerusalemites (who have residency but not citizenship) , differently in many ways. But, even if you insist on ignoring the racist minutiae of Israeli law, you don’t get to say they’re responsible only for their citizens (+/- permanent residents). They’re maintaining an apartheid system in the Occupied Territories (and East Jerusalem) and you don’t get to pretend that this somehow doesn’t count

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Israelis are Israeli. Palestinians are Palestinian. There is Palestinian law and Israeli law. Two separate places, much like any other places in this world.

        • JoBo@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          There is no Palestinian state. Israel is the (illegal) occupying power and has been since 1967, with a stated intent for the Occupation to be permanent. The system is closely equivalent to South African apartheid, with genocidal intent on top.

          Words have meaning. Israel cannot maintain a permanent Occupation, controlling everything and everyone entering or exiting the Occupied Territories, and also pretend that Palestinians are responsible for their own wellbeing. That’s not how it works and if you were under the impression that it is, you have some reading to do.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            There are no Israeli in Palestine. They were forcibly removed by Israel years ago. There was no occupation. Words have meaning.

            • JoBo@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, you’re going to have to expand on that because it looks like a denial of reality. Are you under the impression that Israel is keeping Israelis under occupation?

              There are many older Israelis who regard themselves as Palestinian Jews (“I didn’t come to Israel, Israel came to me”). There are many Israelis living in the Occupied Territories, and many of the non-militant amongst them say they would choose to become Palestinians in the event of a two state solution.

              I’m not sure if you know these people exist but you also seem to be having trouble acknowledging that Palestinians exist and are the ones who are living under occupation and that is … a bit of a headfuck. Can you explain yourself a little more clearly?

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Israel’s plan of unilateral disengagement from the Gaza Strip and North Samaria put forward by Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was carried out on 15 August 2005. The purpose of the plan was to improve Israel’s security and international status in the absence of peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

                There are Palestinians that do live in Israel, and are therefore under Israeli law. Sometimes those laws can be onerous.

                • JoBo@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Ever heard of the West Bank? Know anything about the blockade of Gaza? Which planet are you on?

                  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Palestinian security forces in the West Bank have retained limited security relations with the Israeli counterparts in the IDF and Shin Bet since re-establishment of relations in 2005. The parties cooperate on prevention of Hamas and Islamic Jihad activity in the West Bank, which is considered a threat by both parties.

                  • TheFonz@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I’m curious: do you consider every single military occupation an “apartheid”? I think this concept took hold in western media with the recent Oct 7 attacks but the reality is Gaza and South Africa have very little in common. Apartheid, definitionally, was used to describe a very particular situation and set of circumstances that affected people of color within a singular state. You wouldn’t say ‘Russia is committing “apartheid” because they occupied Crimea’, would you? Don’t get me wrong: there is clearly a military occupation in place and an ongoing war along with a blockade. But Palestinians are self governing people who elect their own leaders and are self managed, right? What am I missing?

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Where in the world are the state of Palestine’s sovereign rights recognized? Do they have control of their own borders? What is the name of their ambassador to the UN?

          • bartolomeo@suppo.fi
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            What is the name of their ambassador to the UN?

            Riyad Mansour. A better example would be “who controls Palestinians’ birth register and therefore who is legally a Palestinian?” Or “who controls the currency and decides the monetary policy for Palestinians?”. Not to mention water, electricity, gas, communications, movement, even whether or not Palestinians get to sleep on any given night.

        • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          A 3+ state solution with a federal union of independent lower states for Israel and Palestine would actually solve the problem. Broaden your horizons.

          • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            This has the same problem as the two state solution - the settlements have stolen Palestinian land. If you can’t resolve that issue for the two state solution, it’s still a problem for 3+.

            • ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              So fucking what, that can be resolved diplomatically at the first levantine congress. I’ll do the writing if they want. The two state solution fails to create a venue at which to resolve these problems and Israel will not submit to UN authority except by force, and Palestine does not have a seat at the table with the UN. I seriously think it’s time for the United States to intervene militarily.

    • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Since israel is occupying the west bank militarily and seizing land there. And people in the west bank can’t vote…

      It’s a full on apartheid. Every major NGO declares israel an apartheid.

      Also it’s so bad that Arab israelis have fled israel out of fear of persecution. One has recently won a court case in the UK on the grounds that israel is an apartheid persecuting it’s Arab citizens.

      Palestinian citizen of Israel granted UK asylum in case said to be unprecedented

      ‘Hasan’, 24, argued he would face persecution in Israel on grounds of his race, faith and its ‘apartheid regime’

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Wesr Bank has their own government separate from Gaza. Palestinian security forces in the West Bank have retained limited security relations with the Israeli counterparts in the IDF and Shin Bet since re-establishment of relations in 2005. The parties cooperate on prevention of Hamas and Islamic Jihad activity in the West Bank, which is considered a threat by both parties.