• BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    NdGT is a pretentious twat who needs to just shut up and sit down.

    I swear the only time he’s relevant is when he’s bitching about some science fiction movie not being 100% accurate

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Personally it was the behemoth worms and psychic mind readers that made me think it wasn’t a documentary, but YMMV

  • jedibob5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    You know, years ago, I used to really like Neil before he adopted this “Well, ackchually…” shtick over scientific inaccuracies in works of fiction. I find him absolutely insufferable now. It’s the same kind of brainworms as CinemaSins.

    • Splatterphace@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Ah yes, loved CinemaSins, ruined how I watch movies, then became too annoying to watch.

      OH GOD THE BELLS

        • felbane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s a weird way to spell “intentionally misunderstanding the point because people arguing about it in the comments drives engagement and is therefore more profitable.”

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      This motherfucker watched a movie where a girl inherits all of the memories of her 4 most recent female ancestors because her mother used drugs while she was pregnant and he’s like “that isn’t how sound moves through sand”

      • VulKendov@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        He’s a physicist, so he’s obviously going to comment on the physics. He might’ve commented on it if he was a geneticist, ob/gyn, or pharmacist.

    • Infinity187@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I totally agree with this sentiment. This is the way I feel about Elon Musk. Although, I do have an exorbitant amount of disdain for the latter.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        quoth @rodhilton@mastodon.social

        He talked about electric cars. I don’t know anything about cars, so when people said he was a genius I figured he must be a genius.

        Then he talked about rockets. I don’t know anything about rockets, so when people said he was a genius I figured he must be a genius.

        Now he talks about software. I happen to know a lot about software & Elon Musk is saying the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard anyone say, so when people say he’s a genius I figure I should stay the hell away from his cars and rockets.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I think that Neil doesn’t understand something very vital about being a science educator which if there is one thing people know about them, it’s that they are smart as hell and whether that is actually true or not the science educator must adopt a self-deprecating, disarming character to be relatable to the audience within the context they are in because of it.

      You can’t play the character of a king and be relatable if people perceive you as actually being a king outside the context of the play….

      • jedibob5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Well-put. Compare Bill Nye, who comes across as highly intelligent, yet still relatable and likable, in large part because his Science Guy character tends to be a bit of a goof, and, more importantly, because he never talks down to his audience.

  • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    “Somebody didn’t do the research on that,” Tyson told the talk show host, making the case that if you pound your fist into a sand dune, it wouldn’t actually produce a thumping sound the way it does in the film. “You can’t thump sand.”

    Oh, this is easy. Neil, the thumping isn’t for the sand its for the spice in the sand which is a near-magical substance that is tied biologically to the sandworms and when consumed by humans in large quantities lets you see into the future. Are you going to try and tell me a substance which clearly grants its user the ability to see through space-time can’t be excited mechanically with thumping it on the ground?

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Actually it does work with regular sand dunes. The sequential baked layers creates a reasoning champer that amplifies sound at certain frequencies.

      https://youtu.be/v29ou094luc

      Which means Neil is actually upset with how much scientific world building Frank Herbert did, since it confuses people like him who haven’t studied sand dunes for decades.

      • Cave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This doesn’t mention anything about it working with any kind of large impact, though. It’s all about higher frequency vibrations from layers of sand moving around. It’s an interesting phenomenon, but jot what is being talked about.

        • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          The resonance depends on the size of the cavity. It’s conceivable that with different sand structure you could get different size resonating chambers. Plus even though a piano is tuned for higher frequency vibrations, it’ll still ring when you thump on it. I’d imagine that’d be the same with these chambers.

    • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Besides the sand worms can pick up on the vibrations. It doesn’t need to be loud. Just be a consistent pattern.

      So having the thump sound is there for artistic purposes. For the art. In a medium used for art.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Well, it’s more than that. I think this is even mentioned in the new movies, but there’s a phenomenon in Dune called “drum sand” that is a section of sand that somehow amplifies vibrations. Obviously it doesn’t matter how any of this works. It’s a story where, if you get high enough, you can predict possible futures. No shit it isn’t realistic. No one cares.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Tweets need to go away period. what a piece of shit content model and platform. Having a very short character limit was never the genius move people thought it was

          • rmuk@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Originally it was a technical necessity since Twitter had to work via SMS which has a limit of 160 characters. The enforced brevity was part of it’s original charm IMHO.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I know where the limit came from but no one forced them to use SMS or make an app, period.

              I never understood how forcing people into so few characters was a good thing. All it did was make people post less thoughtfully and more often.

              This whole thread is people pissed off that NDT posts things without thinking about how they come off so it kind of makes sense he would do that on Twitter.

              • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                I sorta get it. Limits allow for creativity. I find myself being the most creative when I work within limits, selfimposed or otherwise. That’s why I love dnd and pathfinder.

  • VulKendov@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel like people take these way too seriously, like some of these comments sound like it’s personal. Its just a movie/book series if some one wants to poke some fun then just let em.

    • lorkano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s a scifi series, If in their universe sands can pass vibrations for a long range, they are welcome to do whatever they want.

      • drislands@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ehhhh sometimes it goes too far. I remember one time he commented after a mass shooting that, uhm ackshually the flu kills more people than mass shootings so why are you all upset? It was pretty offensive.

        • GladiusB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I wouldn’t call it offensive. It’s factual. It is insensitive. It’s not thinking of those that died and their families.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I would consider it offensive to belittle the murder of children/adults just because diseases kill more people. That’s such a smooth brain take, and is honestly something I’d expect to come out of a Republican politician.

  • Donjuanme@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why does the Internet dog pile onto NDT over every tweet, but seems to try it’s best to ignore Alex Jones et al?

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s a great question. I really don’t understand why almost this entire thread is so pissed at him for making some stupid tweets. Who gives a fuck about tweets? Even years ago.

  • callouscomic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Person who’s only job is science and who is an expert on science comments about the science of things and people find a way to complain about it.

    Let the man die on his silly hills. It’s funny and harmless. Pull the damn stick out. Perhaps go pound sand.

    • 5in1k@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      My bitch with him is he’ll say the most stoner ass thing in the most smug way possible like it’s some insight from god.