At least 157 people were killed and 270 were injured last year in unintentional shootings by children, according to Everytown, an advocacy group for firearm safety.

  • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yes. That’s the only answer. Accommodate the gun fetish. Of course.

    Must be hard to downvote me with one hand stroking a gun and the other down your pants.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          That drives me crazy too. You can look at the numbers, and see that abstinence only simply doesn’t work, that kids in abstinence-only schools have sex earlier, have riskier sexual habits, are more likely to catch and spread STIs, and have higher rates of teen pregnancy. From a simple harm reduction standpoint, you’d think people would say, wow, we can actually achieve what we say our goals are by giving kids accurate advice.

          I don’t get why people want to treat issues like this instead of being pragmatic and looking at the outcomes.

      • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Toddlers are shooting themselves and others. So maybe education needs to start in the maternity ward?

        How about, and I know, it’s crazy, but you could try not having guns in residential homes. It’s insane, I know, but there’s this really weird thing where the rest of the world manages it and their children (so bizarrely) aren’t blowing their faces off on a regular basis

        Nuts, hey…

        • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Gun control would be nice but…we are talking about in the here and now. Right now…guns are in homes. We are suggesting we should at least do everything we can to teach children those guns are dangerous. You do get that right?

          Someone set that building over there on fire! Lets put the fire out!!

          NO! WE MUST MAKE STRONGER LAWS AGAINST ARSON!

          Thats…basically how this comment chain is going dude.

            • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              9 months ago

              So…just gonna gloss over everything else. Remove guns all together and, until we can get to that point, we must do absolutely nothing else to at least hopefully prevent these deaths?

                • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  That would be nice. But right now we are trying to discuss something more realistic, something that could be done now. What do you believe could honestly be done NOW? Mandatory education about firearms or a total ban?

                  • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Ban and buy back. Education campaign about how crime rates are declining and owning a gun just increases the likelihood that you or someone else in your household gets shot by it, or your lovely trigger happy police force.

            • Gormadt@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 months ago

              A very small percentage of children.

              There are more age groups of children than just toddlers.

              I personally support laws requiring gun owners to properly store firearms.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, because that’s what’s happening. Accommodating a gun fetish. That’s 100% not an intentionally inaccurate misrepresentation of what they said.

    • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Must be hard to argue against something that demonstrably works. You sound like the kind of person that would also argue that abstinence is the only thing to teach kids in school, since that’s the only way to prevent pregnancy and STIs.

      • boogetyboo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yep, totally. People against guns are notorious for their backwards viewpoints. Venn diagram is so overlayed and round. Totally. Such stereotype, so common.

        • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          And yet, here you are, make the same kind of ass-backwards argument against something that has been demonstrated to work without attempting to undermine civil rights.